Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 9;12(3):630.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12030630.

Role of Microtubule-Associated Protein 1b in Urothelial Carcinoma: Overexpression Predicts Poor Prognosis

Affiliations

Role of Microtubule-Associated Protein 1b in Urothelial Carcinoma: Overexpression Predicts Poor Prognosis

Tsu-Ming Chien et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

We sought to examine the relationship between microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) and the prognosis of urothelial carcinoma by assessing the microtubule bundle formation genes using a reappraisal transcriptome dataset of urothelial carcinoma (GSE31684). The result revealed that microtubule-associated protein 1b (MAP1B) is the most significant upregulated gene related to cancer progression. Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to measure MAP1B transcription levels in urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC) and the bladder (UBUC). Immunohistochemistry was conducted to detect MAP1B protein expression in 340 UTUC and 295 UBUC cases. Correlations of MAP1B expression with clinicopathological status, disease-specific survival, and metastasis-free survival were completed. To assess the oncogenic functions of MAP1B, the RTCC1 and J82 cell lines were stably silenced against their endogenous MAP1B expression. Study findings indicated that MAP1B overexpression was associated with adverse clinical features and could independently predict unfavorable prognostic effects, indicating its theranostic value in urothelial carcinoma.

Keywords: MAP1B; microtubule; prognosis; transcriptome; urothelial carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis of gene expression in urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma (UBUC) using a published transcriptome dataset (GSE31684). (A) Cluster analysis of genes focusing on the GO microtubule bundle formation class (GO:0001578) revealed that MAP1B was one of the most significantly upregulated genes associated with more advanced pT status and metastatic disease. Tissue specimens from cancers with a distinct pT status are illustrated at the top of the heat map, and the expression levels of upregulated and downregulated genes are represented as a continuum of brightness of red or green, respectively. Specimens with no change in messenger RNA (mRNA) expression are shown in black. (B) Kaplan–Meier plots showing the prognostic significance of MAP1B expression for the survival of UBUC. Using a QuantiGene assay, MAP1B mRNA expression was significantly increased in both (C) upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and (D) UBUC at advanced primary pT stages.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative sections of MAP1B immunostaining. Note the stepwise increments in MAP1B immunoreactivity from the nontumoral urothelial epithelium (inlet) and (A) noninvasive papillary UCs to (B) non–muscle-invasive (pT1), and (C) muscle-invasive (pT2–pT4) UCs. A comparison of mitotic activity showed significantly higher mitotic rates in (D) UTUC and (E) UBUC cells with increased MAP1B expression than in cells with low expression.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showing the prognostic significance of MAP1B expression for the DSS and MFS outcomes of UTUC (A and B) and UBUC (C and D).
Figure 4
Figure 4
MAP1B expression promotes the growth of UC cells in vitro. (A) As compared with RT4 cells, endogenous MAP1B mRNA (upper) and protein (lower) expressions were increased in cells from the J82 and RTCC1 cell lines. (B) The two cell lines with high endogenous MAP1B expression were stably silenced against MAP1B expression by a lentiviral vector bearing one of the two clones of MAP1B shRNA with different sequences for both RTCC1 (left panel) and J82 (right panel) cells. Using an ELISA-based colorimetric assay to assess the rate of BrdU uptake, cell proliferation was significantly reduced in stable MAP1B-knockdown (C1) RTCC1 and (C2) J82 cell lines compared with that in the corresponding shLacZ controls. Similar trends were found for cell migration and invasion among cells from the (C3 and C5) RTCC1 and (C4 and C6) J82 cell lines. (* p<0.05). More details of western blot, please view at the supplementary materials.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Stable MAP1B knockdown increases the sub-G1 population with significantly altered cell-cycle progression. Cell-cycle analysis as conducted by flow cytometry identified a remarkable increment of sub-G1 population indicating cell death in MAP1B-knockdown RTCC1 (upper panel) and J82 (lower panel) cells.
Figure 6
Figure 6
MAP1B knockdown induces apoptosis. Flow cytometric analysis of annexin V/propidium iodide-stained RTCC1 (upper panel) and J82 (lower panel) cell lines disclosed MAP1B knockdown significantly increased percentage of apoptosis. (* p < 0.05).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Stable MAP1B knockdown increased vinblastine-induced apoptosis. Flow cytometric analysis of vinblastine-treated RTCC1 (upper panel) and J82 (lower panel) cell lines disclosed that MAP1B knockdown significantly increased the sub-G1 population, indicating induced cell apoptosis.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Stable MAP1B knockdown increase vinblastine-induced apoptosis. Flow cytometric analysis of annexin V/propidium iodide-stained RTCC1 (upper panel) and J82 (lower panel) cell lines demonstrated MAP1B knockdown significantly increased percentage of vinblastine-induced apoptosis. (* p < 0.05).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of MAP1B expression for the DFS of the UBUC patient cohort receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showing the prognostic significance of MAP1B expression for the DFS of the UBUC patient cohort receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

References

    1. Torre L.A., Bray F., Siegel R.L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lynch C.F., Davila J.A., Platz C.E. Cancer of the urinary bladder. In: Ries Y.J., Keel G.E., Eisner M.P., editors. SEER Survival Monograph: Cancer Survival Among Adults: US SEER Program, 1988–2001, Patient and Tumor Characteristics, National. Cancer Institute, SEER Program; Bethesda, MD, USA: 2007. pp. 193–202.
    1. Margulis V., Shariat S.F., Matin S.F., Kamat A.M., Zigeuner R., Kikuchi E., Lotan Y., Weizer A., Raman J.D., Wood C.G. Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: A series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Cancer. 2009;115:1224–1233. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24135. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lai M.N., Wang S.M., Chen P.C., Chen Y.Y., Wang J.D. Population-based case-control study of Chinese herbal products containing aristolochic acid and urinary tract cancer risk. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2010;102:179–186. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp467. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li C.C., Chang T.H., Wu W.J., Ke H.L., Huang S.P., Tsai P.C., Chang S.J., Shen J.T., Chou Y.H., Huang C.H. Significant predictive factors for prognosis of primary upper urinary tract cancer after radical nephroureterectomy in Taiwanese patients. Eur. Urol. 2008;54:1127–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.054. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources