Endemic Plant Species Conservation: Biotechnological Approaches
- PMID: 32182892
- PMCID: PMC7154900
- DOI: 10.3390/plants9030345
Endemic Plant Species Conservation: Biotechnological Approaches
Abstract
Endemic plant species are usually more vulnerable to anthropogenic threats and natural changes and, therefore, hold a higher extinction risk. The preservation of these species is a major concern on a worldwide context and in situ protection alone will not guarantee their conservation. Ex situ conservation measures must be undertaken to support the conservation of these species, and seed banking is the more efficient and cost-effective method. However, when seed banking is not an option, alternative approaches should be considered. Biotechnological tools provide new and complementary options for plant conservation including short-, medium-, and long-term strategies, and their application for plant species conservation has increased considerably in the last years. This review provides information about the status of the use biotechnology-based techniques for the conservation of endemic plant species. Particular attention is given to cryopreservation, since is the only long-term ex situ conservation strategy that can complement and support the other conservation measures. The cryopreservation of plant genetic resources is, however, more focused on crop or economically important species and few studies are available for endemic plant species. The plant material used, the cryopreservation methods employed, and the assessment of cryogenic effects are reviewed. The reasons to explain the difficulties in cryopreserving these species are discussed and new strategies are proposed to facilitate and increase the interest on this matter. We expect that further studies on the conservation of endemic plant species will increase in a near future, thus contributing to maintain these valuable genetic resources.
Keywords: cryopreservation techniques; ex situ conservation; explant; genetic stability; micropropagation; seeds; shoot tips; vitrification.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- FAO . The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture. In: Bélanger J., Pilling D., editors. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2019. [(accessed on 18 January 2020)]. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/CA3129EN/CA3129EN.pdf.
-
- Cuttelod A., García N., Abdul Malak D., Temple H., Katariya V. In: The 2008 Review of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Vié J.-C., Hilton-Taylor C., Stuart S.N., editors. IUCN; Gland, Switzerland: 2008. p. 1.
-
- Reed B.M., Sarasan V., Kane M., Bunn E., Pence V.C. Biodiversity conservation and conservation biotechnology tools. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 2011;47:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s11627-010-9337-0. - DOI
-
- Sarasan V., Cripps R., Ramsay M.M., Atherton C., Mcmichen M., Prendergast G., Rowntree J.K. Conservation in vitro of threatened plants—Progress in the past decade. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 2006;42:206–214. doi: 10.1079/IVP2006769. - DOI
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
