Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound versus Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early Breast Cancer
- PMID: 32183080
- PMCID: PMC7143354
- DOI: 10.3390/medicina56030127
Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound versus Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early Breast Cancer
Abstract
Background and objectives: With improved diagnostic means of early breast cancer, the percentage of cases with metastasis in axillary lymph nodes has decreased from 50%-75% to 15%-30%. Lymphadenectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy are not treatment procedures, as they aim at axillary nodal staging in breast cancer. Being surgical interventions, they can lead to various complications. Therefore, recently much attention has been paid to the identification of non-invasive methods for axillary nodal staging. In many countries, ultrasound is a first-line method to evaluate axillary lymph node status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of ultrasound in detecting intact axillary lymph nodes and to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in detecting a heavy nodal disease burden. The additional objective was to evaluate patients' and tumor characteristics leading to false-negative results. Materials and Methods: A total of 227 women with newly diagnosed pT1 breast cancer were included to this prospective study conducted at the Breast Surgery Unit, Clinic of Surgery, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, between May 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018. All patients underwent preoperative axillary ultrasound examination. Ultrasound data were compared with the results of histological examination. The accuracy and true-negative rate of ultrasound were calculated. The reasons of false-negative results were analyzed. Results: Of the 189 patients who had normally appearing axillary lymph nodes on preoperative ultrasound (PAUS-negative), 173 (91.5%) patients were also confirmed to have intact axillary lymph nodes (node-negative) by histological examination after surgery. The accuracy and the negative predictive value of ultrasound examination were 84.1% and 91.5%, respectively. In ≥3 node-positive cases, the accuracy and the negative predictive value increased to 88.7% and 98.3%, respectively. In total, false-negative results were found in 8.5% of the cases (n = 16); in the PAUS-negative group, false-negative results were recorded only in 1.6% of the cases (n = 3). The results of PAUS and pathological examination differed significantly between patients without and with lymphovascular invasion (LV0 vs. LV1, p < 0.001) as well as those showing no human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression and patients with weakly or strongly expressed HER2 (HER2(0) vs. HER2(1), p = 0.024). Paired comparisons revealed that the true-negative rate was significantly different between the LV0 and LV1 groups (91% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.05), and the false-negative rate was statistically significant different between the HER2(0) and HER2(1) groups (10.5% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.05). Evaluation of other characteristics showed both the groups to be homogenous. Conclusions: Negative axillary ultrasound excluded axillary metastatic disease in 91.5% of the patients. PAUS had an accuracy of 88.7% in detecting a heavy nodal disease burden. With the absence of lymphovascular invasion (LV0), we can rely on PAUS examination that axillary lymph nodes are intact (PAUS-negative), and this patients' group could avoid sentinel lymph node biopsy. Patients without HER2 expression are at a greater likelihood of false-negative results; therefore, the findings of ultrasound that axillary lymph nodes are intact (PAUS-negative results) should be interpreted with caution.
Keywords: axillary lymph nodes; breast cancer; lymphadenectomy; sentinel lymph node biopsy; ultrasound.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Sentinel lymphadenectomy accurately predicts nodal status in T2 breast cancer.J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Dec;191(6):593-9. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00732-8. J Am Coll Surg. 2000. PMID: 11129806
-
Role of axillary lymph node ultrasound and large core biopsy in the preoperative assessment of patients selected for sentinel node biopsy.Radiol Med. 2005 Apr;109(4):330-44. Radiol Med. 2005. PMID: 15883518 English, Italian.
-
Evaluation of immunohistochemistry and multiple-level sectioning in sentinel lymph nodes from patients with breast cancer.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003 Jun;127(6):701-5. doi: 10.5858/2003-127-701-EOIAMS. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003. PMID: 12741893
-
Sentinel lymph node as a new marker for therapeutic planning in breast cancer patients.J Surg Oncol. 2004 Mar;85(3):102-11. doi: 10.1002/jso.20022. J Surg Oncol. 2004. PMID: 14991881 Review.
-
Breast cancer patients with a negative axillary ultrasound may have clinically significant nodal metastasis.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jun;187(2):303-310. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06194-8. Epub 2021 Apr 10. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021. PMID: 33837870 Review.
Cited by
-
Outcomes of targeted axillary radiation therapy with omission of axillary dissection in early breast cancer patients with one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes and extracapsular extension.BMC Surg. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02974-x. BMC Surg. 2025. PMID: 40457311 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients based on ultrasonograhic-clinicopathologic features.Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jan;41(1):96-100. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.1.10384. Pak J Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 39867764 Free PMC article.
-
Dopamine D1 Receptor in Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 2;12(11):3232. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113232. Cancers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33147760 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Construction of risk prediction model of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients based on machine learning algorithm.Discov Oncol. 2025 May 8;16(1):704. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02493-4. Discov Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40341608 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of US in Depicting Axillary Metastasis in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients.J Pers Med. 2021 Dec 16;11(12):1379. doi: 10.3390/jpm11121379. J Pers Med. 2021. PMID: 34945851 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Maxwell F., Mellon C.D.M., Bricout M., Cauderlier E., Chapelier M., Albiter M., Bourrier P., Espié M., de Kerviler M., de Bazelaire C. Diagnostic strategy for the assessment of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer. Diagn. Interv. Imaging. 2015;96:1089–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.07.007. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dihge L. Ph.D. Thesis. Lund University; Lund, Sweden: 2018. Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Breast Cancer Risk Models for Tailored Axillary Management.
-
- Barco I., Chabrera C., García-Fernández A., Fraile M., González S., Canales L., Lain J.M., González C., Vidal M.C., Vallejo E., et al. Role of axillary ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the preoperative triage of breast cancer patients. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2017 doi: 10.1007/s12094-016-1589-7. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous