Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):30.
doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00423-0.

Percentage fat fraction in magnetic resonance imaging: upgrading the osteoporosis-detecting parameter

Rong Chang  1 , Xiaowen Ma  1 , Yonghong Jiang  1 , Dageng Huang  2 , Xiujin Chen  2 , Ming Zhang  3 , Dingjun Hao  4
Affiliations

Percentage fat fraction in magnetic resonance imaging: upgrading the osteoporosis-detecting parameter

Rong Chang et al. BMC Med Imaging. .

Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis (OP) is a systemic metabolic bone disorder identified as an essential health issue worldwide. Orthopedic imaging approaches were commonly used with some limitations. Thus, our study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1-H MRS) and m-Dixon-Quant in OP.

Methods: A total of 76 subjects were enrolled in the study and bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Then, the subjects were divided into three groups according to BMD: normal control group, osteopenia group and OP group. The following parameters were recorded for each patient: gender, age, height, body weight, waist circumference, and hip circumference. Further, the fat fraction percentage (FF%) values were determined by 1-H MRS and m-Dixon-Quant methods.

Results: In both 1-H MRS and magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI) m-Dixon-Quant, the FF% exhibited a negative correlation with BMD (P < 0.05). The FF% value of the OP group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, the FF% value in the m-Dixon scans was positively related to age, while BMD showed a negative linear relationship with age (P < 0.0001). Further, females had a significantly higher FF% value compared to males (P < 0.01), and height was correlated with BMD (P < 0.05) but not with FF% (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: MRI investigations especially FF% value in the m-Dixon-Quant imaging system is correlated with OP. Its diagnostic value remains to be demonstrated on a large prospective cohort of patients. Besides, parameters such as age, gender, and height are important factors for predicting and diagnosing OP.

Keywords: Bone mineral density; Fat fraction; MRI m-Dixon-quant; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
FF is negatively correlated with BMD. a The FF% for both 1H MRS and m-Dixon-Quant imaging had a significantly negative correlation with the average bone density value. b The patients were divided into three groups: normal control group, osteopenia group, and OP group; the FF% value in the m-Dixon-Quant method was significantly higher in the OP group compared to normal control group. The bar presents the standard deviation; *P < 0.05
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The 1H MRS and m-Dixon-Quant images of two individuals in normal control group and OP group. In the 1H MRS quantitative analysis, the lipid peak of the L2 vertebral body of OP patient (b) was significantly increased compared to the normal control (a). The same trend was observed for the L3 vertebral body in the m-Dixon-Quant analysis of normal control (c) and OP (d) cases
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Age, gender, and height correlated with BMD and FF% values. a Age largely determined BMD and FF levels a. FF% in m-Dixon exhibited a positive correlation with age, while BMD showed a negative linear relationship. b Females had a higher FF% level compared to males. The bar presents the standard deviation; **P < 0.01. c Height was correlated with BMD, but not FF% (P = 0.064)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Karahan AY, Kaya B, Kuran B, Altındag O, Yildirim P, Dogan SC, Basaran A, Salbas E, Altınbilek T, Guler T. Common mistakes in the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in Turkey. A retrospective descriptive multicenter study. Acta Med Austriaca. 2017;59(4):117–123. - PubMed
    1. Jarraya M, Hayashi D, Griffith JF, Guermazi A, Genant HK. Identification of Vertebral Fractures. 2013.
    1. Chao CT, Chiang CK, Huang JW, Chan DC, group COoGNiNTUHs Effect of frail phenotype on bone mass and vertebral compression fracture in individuals undergoing dialysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(9):e19–e21. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14296. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouxsein ML, Seeman E. Quantifying the material and structural determinants of bone strength. 23(6):741–53. - PubMed
    1. Justesen J, Stenderup K, Ebbesen EN, Mosekilde LI, Kassem M. Adipocyte tissue volume in bone marrow is increased with aging and in patients with osteoporosis. Biogerontology. 2001;2(3):165–171. doi: 10.1023/A:1011513223894. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types