Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 17;21(1):54.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01124-x.

Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries

Affiliations

Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries

Giacomo Scaioli et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: The communication of relevant patient information between general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists is important in order to avoid fragmentation of care thus achieving a higher quality of care and ensuring physicians' and patients' satisfaction. However, this communication is often not carried out properly. The objective of this study is to assess whether communication between GPs and medical specialists in the referral process is associated with the organisation of primary care within a country, the characteristics of the GPs, and the characteristics of the primary care practices themselves.

Methods: An analysis of a cross-sectional survey among GPs in 34 countries was conducted. The odds ratios of the features that were expected to relate to higher rates of referral letters sent and communications fed back to GPs were calculated using ordered logistic multilevel models.

Results: A total of 7183 GPs from 34 countries were surveyed. Variations between countries in referral letters sent and feedback communication received did occur. Little of the variance between countries could be explained. GPs stated that they send more referral letters, and receive more feedback communications from medical specialists, in countries where they act as gatekeepers, and when, in general, they interact more with specialists. GPs reported higher use of referral letters when they had a secretary and/or a nurse in their practice, used health information technologies, and had greater job satisfaction.

Conclusions: There are large differences in communication between GPs and medical specialists. These differences can partly be explained by characteristics of the country, the GP and the primary care practice. Further studies should also take the organisation of secondary care into account.

Keywords: Communication; Continuity of care; Primary care; Referrals; Secondary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Visual model: features that potentially influence communication between GPs and medical specialists
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Rates of use of referral letters by GPs when referring a patient to a medical specialist, and of receipt of feedback communication by GPs after the referral, by country

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . The World Health Report 2008. Primary health care. Now More Than Ever. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
    1. Kringos DS, Boerma WG, Hutchinson A, et al. The breadth of primary care: a systematic literature review of its core dimensions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:65. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-65. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uijen AA, Schers HJ, Schellevis FG, et al. How unique is continuity of care? A review of continuity and related concepts. Fam Pract. 2012;29:264–271. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr104. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, et al. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003;327:1219–1221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sinnige J, Korevaar JC, Westert GP, et al. Multimorbidity patterns in a primary care population aged 55 years and over. Fam Pract. 2015;32:505–513. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms