Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 1;4(1):bjgpopen20X101020.
doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101020. Print 2020.

Exploring patients' and clinicians' experiences of video consultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review

Affiliations

Exploring patients' and clinicians' experiences of video consultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review

Arun Thiyagarajan et al. BJGP Open. .

Abstract

Background: Video consultation (VC) is an emerging consultation mode in general practice. The challenges and benefits of implementing it are not necessarily realised until it is in use, and being experienced by patients and clinicians. To date, there has been no review of the evidence about how patients and clinicians experience VC in general practice.

Aim: The study aimed to explore both patients' and clinicians' experiences of VCs in primary care.

Design & setting: A systematic scoping review was carried out of empirical studies.

Method: All major databases were searched for empirical studies of any design, published from 1 January 2010 to 11 October 2018 in the English language. Studies were included where synchronous VCs occurred between a patient and a clinician in a primary care setting. Outcomes of interest related to experience of use. The quality of included studies were assessed. Findings were analysed using narrative synthesis.

Results: Seven studies were included in the review. Patients reported being satisfied with VC, describing reduced waiting times and travel costs as a benefit. For patients and clinicians, VC was not deemed appropriate for all presentations and all situations, and a face-to-face consultation was seen as preferable where this was possible.

Conclusion: The findings of this scoping review show that primary care patients and clinicians report both positive and negative experiences when using VCs, and these experiences are, to a certain extent, context dependent. VC is potentially more convenient for patients, but is not considered superior to a face-to-face consultation. Accounts of experience are useful in the planning and implementation of any VC service.

Keywords: patient satisfaction; physician—patient relations; primary health care; remote consultation; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. PRISMA diagram: papers included in the review.
VC = video consultation.

References

    1. Vijayaraghavan S, O'Shea T, Campbell-Richards D, et al. Dawn: diabetes appointments via Webcam in Newham. British Journal of Diabetes. 2015;15(3):123–126. doi: 10.15277/bjdvd.2015.032. - DOI
    1. Jury SC, Walker AM, Kornberg AJ. The introduction of web-based video-consultation in a paediatric acute care setting. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19(7):383–387. doi: 10.1177/1357633X13506530. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Middleton-Green L, Gadoud A, Norris B, et al. ‘A Friend in the Corner’: supporting people at home in the last year of life via telephone and video consultation — an evaluation. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2016:bmjspcare-2015-001016. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jiwa M, Meng X. Video consultation use by Australian general practitioners: video vignette study. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(6):e117. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2638. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kitamura C, Zurawel-Balaura L, Wong RKS. How effective is video consultation in clinical oncology? A systematic review. Curr Oncol. 2010;17(3):17–27. doi: 10.3747/co.v17i3.513. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources