Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 3:14:643-651.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S230195. eCollection 2020.

Microscope Integrated Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided DMEK in Corneas with Poor Visualization

Affiliations

Microscope Integrated Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided DMEK in Corneas with Poor Visualization

Namrata Sharma et al. Clin Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the utility of microscope-integrated intraoperative optical coherence tomography (Mi-OCT) for performing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in corneas with poor visualization.

Methods: It is a prospective interventional case series that included 25 consecutive cases of corneal decompensation with poor visualization that underwent Mi-OCT-guided DMEK at a tertiary eye care centre. The main outcome measures were graft attachment on day 3 and requirement for re-bubbling.

Results: The etiology for corneal decompensation was pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (n=17), Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (n=4), failed graft (n=2), iridocorneal endothelial syndrome (n=1) and failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (n=1). Complete graft attachment was noted in 72% of cases. Graft detachment was noted in 16% of cases which required re-bubbling. No intervention was done for shallow peripheral detachment (n=2) and peripheral Descemet membrane (DM) fold (n=1). All grafts were attached at six-months follow-up. The mean corrected distance visual acuity and central corneal thickness improved from 1.4 ± 0.5 logMAR and 799.6 ± 110.9 µm at baseline to 0.3 ± 0.3 logMAR and 536.28 ± 11.44 um at six months. Mi-OCT was helpful in visualizing areas of peripheral anterior synechiae, missing DM, retained DM tags after descemetorhexis, DMEK roll configuration and orientation in the injector and anterior chamber, interface fluid and peripheral folds in the DMEK graft.

Conclusion: Mi-OCT helps in identification of the anatomy and dynamics of the host DM, DM roll and anterior chamber in cases with poor visualization and is a useful tool while performing DMEK in such cases.

Keywords: DMEK; Mi-OCT; descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; iOCT; microscope-integrated intra-operative optical coherence tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intraoperative images of donor tissue preparation before trephining the peeled graft (A) showing fluid between the peeled DMEK graft and stromal bed on Mi-OCT; (B) showing the decrease in fluid space with the peeled DMEK graft falling back on the stromal bed after drying the edges with a Merocel wick on Mi-OCT.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intraoperative images (A) showing retained DM tag (marked with red arrow) after descemetorhexis; (B) removal of a retained DM tag with intravitreal forceps.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraoperative image showing DMEK roll orientation in the DMEK injector (A) prior to injection (the graft is inverted with DM facing down as highlighted by the red arrow); (B) at the time of injection (the graft is oriented with the DM towards the right as highlighted by the red arrow).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Intraoperative images showing (A) tight scroll in anterior chamber; (B) double scroll with Descemet up and endothelium down (correct orientation); (C) double scroll with Descemet down and endothelium up (incorrect orientation); (D) well attached DMEK graft in a case of failed graft.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Intraoperative image showing (A) Fold at the edge of the graft with the DM folded down after injection of air; (B) injection of BSS below the graft at the site of fold to induce unfolding; (C) completely unfolded and attached graft.
None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Price MO, Gupta P, Lass J, Price FW Jr. EK (DLEK, DSEK, DMEK): new Frontier in cornea surgery. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2017;3:69–90. doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061400 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh A, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Avadhanam V, Liu C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping endothelial kerato - PubMed - NCBI. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28834814. Accessed July23, 2018. - PubMed
    1. Melles GRJ, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea. 2006;25(8):987–990. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000248385.16896.34 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maharana PK, Sahay P, Titiyal JS, Sharma N. Sinsky hook assisted roll preparation (SHARP): a modified technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty donor preparation. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.sjopt.2018.12.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Terry MA, Straiko MD, Veldman PB, et al. Standardized DMEK technique: reducing complications using prestripped tissue, novel glass injector, and Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) gas. Cornea. 2015;34(8):845–852. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000479 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources