Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 17;22(3):61.
doi: 10.1208/s12248-020-00441-4.

Applying Beta Distribution in Analyzing Bounded Outcome Score Data

Affiliations

Applying Beta Distribution in Analyzing Bounded Outcome Score Data

Chuanpu Hu et al. AAPS J. .

Abstract

Disease status is often measured with bounded outcome scores (BOS) which report a discrete set of values on a finite range. The distribution of such data is often non-standard, such as J- or U-shaped, for which standard analysis methods assuming normal distribution become inappropriate. Most BOS analysis methods aim to either predict the data within its natural range or accommodate data skewness, but not both. In addition, a frequent modeling objective is to predict clinical response of treatment using derived disease endpoints, defined as meeting certain criteria of improvement from baseline in disease status. This objective has not yet been addressed in existing BOS data analyses. This manuscript compares a recently proposed beta distribution-based approach with the standard continuous analysis approach, using an established mechanism-based longitudinal exposure-response model to analyze data from two phase 3 clinical studies in psoriatic patients. The beta distribution-based approach is shown to be superior in describing the BOS data and in predicting the derived endpoints, along with predicting the response time course of a highly sensitive subpopulation.

Keywords: NONMEM; change from baseline; discrete data; latent variable; population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Psychol Methods. 2006 Mar;11(1):54-71 - PubMed
    1. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;79(1):18-27 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2013 Feb;40(1):81-91 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2017 Oct;44(5):437-448 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2016 Feb;43(1):45-54 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources