Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul;33(4):301-305.
doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000607.

Drug checking to detect fentanyl and new psychoactive substances

Affiliations
Review

Drug checking to detect fentanyl and new psychoactive substances

Joseph J Palamar et al. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Drug checking services invite drug consumers to anonymously submit drug samples for chemical analysis and provide feedback of results. Drugs are tested for strength/dose and/or presence of adulterants. Drug checking appears to be more common in recent years in response to increases in fentanyl-related deaths and the proliferation of new psychoactive substances (NPS). We aim to provide information regarding the current state of drug checking in relation to analysis methods, adulteration rates, and behavioral responses to results.

Recent findings: Various technologies are being used to detect the presence of fentanyl, its analogs, and other NPS in drug samples. Proxy drug checking, which we define as biospecimen testing for drug exposure postconsumption, is also becoming common. However, there appears to a dichotomy between research focusing on populations at high risk for fentanyl exposure and to exposure to NPS such as synthetic cathinones.

Summary: Drug checking research and services largely focus on opioid consumers and nightclub and dance festival attendees, but more focus may be needed on the general population. Drug checking results can inform surveillance efforts, and more research is needed to overcome barriers to drug checking and to focus on whether test results indeed affect behavior change.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Barratt MJ, Kowalski M, Maier LJ, Ritter A. Global review of drug checking services operating in 2017. In: Drug policy modelling program bulletin no. 24. Sydney, Australia: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney; 2018.
    2. The bulletin provides a comprehensive description of drug checking services operating worldwide.

    1. Renfroe CL. MDMA on the street: analysis anonymous. J Psychoactive Drugs 1986; 18:363–369. - PubMed
    1. Bloomberg American Health Initiative. Fentanyl overdose reduction checking analysis study. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; 2018. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive study to compare methods for detecting fentanyl and/or its analogs.
    2. This study also provides and compares statistics on sensitivity and specificity of each method.

    1. Tupper W, McCrae K, Garber I, et al. Initial results of a drug checking pilot program to detect fentanyl adulteration in a Canadian setting. Drug Alcohol Depend 2018; 190:242–245. - PubMed
    2. The study in particular demonstrates that common psychedelics and party drugs (e.g., ecstasy) are currently unlikley to contain fentanyl. However, alarmingly, some samples of purported (meth)amphetamine and cocaine indeed contained fentanyl.

    1. Vandergrift GW, Hessels AJ, Palaty J, et al. Paper spray mass spectrometry for the direct, semi-quantitative measurement of fentanyl and norfentanyl in complex matrices. Clin Biochem 2018; 54:106–111. - PubMed

Publication types