Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;32(2):189-196.
doi: 10.1002/hpja.336. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

Parents' use of information accessed through social media to make immunisation decisions for their young children

Madelaine Thorpe  1 , Jane Taylor  1 , Rachel Cole  1
Affiliations

Parents' use of information accessed through social media to make immunisation decisions for their young children

Madelaine Thorpe et al. Health Promot J Austr. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Issue addressed: Social media, while available to parents to inform decisions about their child's health, including immunisation, is a new area of exploration in public health. To effectively source, interpret and use such information, parents need to be health literate. This pilot study explored how parents of young children under 7 years of age obtained, understood and used immunisation information available through social media to inform immunisation decisions for their children.

Methods: Purposive sampling followed by a snowball technique was used to recruit parents with one or more children under 7 years of age living in the Brisbane North and Sunshine Coast regions, Australia. Face-to-face interviews collected qualitative data in relation to how parents obtained, understood and used information sourced via social media to make immunisation decisions for their children.

Results: All participants were passively exposed to immunisation information on social media through Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, Pinterest, LinkedIn and Twitter, but did not report proactively searching for information. The majority understood the immunisation information obtained, however, did not perceive it as credible and used other sources to clarify credibility, including their health care professional. Some participants interacted with the information, but none used it to make immunisation decisions for their children.

Conclusions: Whilst parents of children under 7 years of age are exposed to immunisation information on social media, they do not use this information to make immunisation decisions for their children, and rely on health care professionals for credible information. SO WHAT?: Given health care providers are perceived by parents of young children as credible sources of immunisation information and parents are regularly exposed to immunisation information via social media, further exploration of the potential role of health care professionals in the dissemination of credible immunisation information via social media platforms is warranted.

Keywords: health literacy; information and communication technology; qualitative methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Macario E, Ednacot E, Ullberg L, Reichel J. The changing face and rapid pace of public health communication. J Commun Healthc. 2011;4(2):145-50.
    1. Korda H, Itani Z. Harnessing social media for health promotion and behavior change. Health Promot Pract. 2013;14(1):15-23.
    1. Betsch C, Brewer NT, Brocard P, Davies P, Gaissmaier W, Haase N, et al. Opportunities and challenges of web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. Vaccine. 2012;30(25):3727-33.
    1. Witteman H, Zikmund-Fisher B. The defining characteristics of web 2.0 and their potential influence in the online vaccination debate. Vaccine. 2012;30(25):3734-40.
    1. Betsch C, Sachse KD. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? (How) the internet influences vaccination decisions: recent evidence and tentative guidelines for online vaccine communication. Vaccine. 2012;30(25):3723-6.

LinkOut - more resources