Systematic Review of Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-dimer for Diagnostic Rule-out Of Suspected Acute Aortic Syndromes
- PMID: 32187432
- DOI: 10.1111/acem.13969
Systematic Review of Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-dimer for Diagnostic Rule-out Of Suspected Acute Aortic Syndromes
Abstract
Objectives: In patients at low clinical probability of acute aortic syndromes (AASs), decision on advanced aortic imaging is cumbersome. Integration of the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS) with D-dimer (DD) provides a potential pipeline for standardized diagnostic rule-out. We systematically reviewed and summarized supporting data.
Methods: Cross-sectional studies assessing integration of ADD-RS with DD for diagnosis of AASs were identified on MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web Of Science databases. Two reviewers independently screened articles, assessed quality, and extracted data. The quality of design and reporting was evaluated with the QUADAS-2 and STARD tools. Individual patient data were obtained, to allow analysis of both conventional (500 ng/mL) and age-adjusted (DDage-adj ) DD cutoffs. Data were summarized for four diagnostic strategies combining ADD-RS = 0 or ≤ 1, with DD < 500 ng/mL or < DDage-adj . The statistical heterogeneity of the diagnostic variables was estimated with Higgins' I2 . Pooled values were calculated for variables showing nonsignificant heterogeneity.
Results: After screening of 680 studies, four articles (including a total of 3,804 patients) met inclusion criteria. One prospective study provided a low risk of bias/applicability concerns, while methodologic limitations were found in the other three retrospective studies. Statistical heterogeneity was negligible for sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio (LR) values and significant for specificity and positive LR values of all diagnostic strategies. Pooled sensitivity was 99.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 99.3% to 100%, I2 = 0) for ADD-RS = 0 and DD < 500 ng/mL or < DDage-adj , 98.9% (95% CI = 97.9% to 99.9%, I2 = 0) for ADD-RS ≤ 1 and DD < 500 ng/mL, and 97.6% (95% CI = 96.3% to 98.9%, I2 = 0) for ADD-RS ≤ 1 and DD < DDage-adj .
Conclusions: Despite methodologic limitations, integration of ADD-RS = 0 or ≤ 1 with DD < 500 ng/mL shows negligible heterogeneity and consistently high sensitivity across studies, thus supporting reliability for diagnostic rule-out of AASs. Data supporting ADD-RS = 0 plus DDage-adj appear preliminary and require further scrutiny.
© 2020 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic accuracy of the aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer for acute aortic syndromes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Jun 21;19(6):e0304401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304401. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38905181 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-Dimer for Acute Aortic Syndromes: The ADvISED Prospective Multicenter Study.Circulation. 2018 Jan 16;137(3):250-258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029457. Epub 2017 Oct 13. Circulation. 2018. PMID: 29030346
-
Performance and costs of rule-out protocols for acute aortic syndromes: analysis of pooled prospective cohorts.Eur J Intern Med. 2025 Jun;136:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2025.03.039. Epub 2025 Apr 11. Eur J Intern Med. 2025. PMID: 40221228
-
Improved rule-out diagnostic gain with a combined aortic dissection detection risk score and D-dimer Bayesian decision support scheme.J Crit Care. 2017 Feb;37:56-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 17. J Crit Care. 2017. PMID: 27632799
-
Accuracy of aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Oct;9(3_suppl):S32-S39. doi: 10.1177/2048872620901831. Epub 2020 Jan 23. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020. PMID: 31970996
Cited by
-
A Novel Tool for Distinguishing Type A Acute Aortic Syndrome from Heart Failure and Acute Coronary Syndrome.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 18;13(22):3472. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223472. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37998608 Free PMC article.
-
Age-Adjusted D-Dimer in Ruling Out Acute Aortic Syndrome.Emerg Med Int. 2022 Feb 5;2022:6864756. doi: 10.1155/2022/6864756. eCollection 2022. Emerg Med Int. 2022. PMID: 35169515 Free PMC article.
-
Syncope in the Emergency Department: A Practical Approach.J Clin Med. 2024 May 30;13(11):3231. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113231. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38892942 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Diagnostic and management of acute aortic syndrome].Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2022 Mar 1;60(2):188-200. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2022. PMID: 35759570 Free PMC article. Review. Spanish.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of the aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer for acute aortic syndromes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Jun 21;19(6):e0304401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304401. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38905181 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bossone E, LaBounty TM, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. Eur Heart J 2018;39:739-49d.
-
- Goodacre S, Cross E, Arnold J, Angelini K, Capewell S, Nicholl J. The health care burden of acute chest pain. Heart 2005;91:229-30.
-
- Alshekhlee A, Shen WK, Mackall J, Chelimsky TC. Incidence and mortality rates of syncope in the United States. Am J Med 2009;122:181-8.
-
- Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA, et al. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010;122:1756-76.
-
- Owens PL, Barrett ML, Gibson TB, Andrews RM, Weinick RM, Mutter RL. Emergency department care in the United States: a profile of national data sources. Ann Emerg Med 2010;56:150-65.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous