Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;68(7):1512-1519.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.16412. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

Home Health Rehabilitation Utilization Among Medicare Beneficiaries Following Critical Illness

Affiliations

Home Health Rehabilitation Utilization Among Medicare Beneficiaries Following Critical Illness

Jason R Falvey et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: Medicare beneficiaries recovering from a critical illness are increasingly being discharged home instead of to post-acute care facilities. Rehabilitation services are commonly recommended for intensive care unit (ICU) survivors; however, little is known about the frequency and dose of home-based rehabilitation in this population.

Design: Retrospective analysis of 2012 Medicare hospital and home health (HH) claims data, linked with assessment data from the Medicare Outcomes and Assessment Information Set.

Setting: Participant homes.

Participants: Medicare beneficiaries recovering from an ICU stay longer than 24 hours, who were discharged directly home with HH services within 7 days of discharge and survived without readmission or hospice transfer for at least 30 days (n = 3,176).

Measurements: Count of rehabilitation visits received during HH care episode.

Results: A total of 19,564 rehabilitation visits were delivered to ICU survivors over 118,145 person-days in HH settings, a rate of 1.16 visits per week. One-third of ICU survivors received no rehabilitation visits during HH care. In adjusted models, those with the highest baseline disability received 30% more visits (rate ratio [RR] = 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17-1.45) than those with the least disability. Conversely, an inverse relationship was found between multimorbidity (Elixhauser scores) and count of rehabilitation visits received; those with the highest tertile of Elixhauser scores received 11% fewer visits (RR = .89; 95% CI = .81-.99) than those in the lowest tertile. Participants living in a rural setting (vs urban) received 6% fewer visits (RR = .94; 95% CI = .91-.98); those who lived alone received 11% fewer visits (RR = .89; 95% CI = .82-.96) than those who lived with others.

Conclusion: On average, Medicare beneficiaries discharged home after a critical illness receive few rehabilitation visits in the early post-hospitalization period. Those who had more comorbidities, who lived alone, or who lived in rural settings received even fewer visits, suggesting a need for their consideration during discharge planning. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1512-1519, 2020.

Keywords: critical illness; home health; occupational therapy; physical therapy; post-hospital rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.”

Conflicts of Interest:

The authors have no conflicts.

Figures

FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 1:
Distribution of rehabilitation visits over the first episode of home health for 3176 Medicare beneficiaries who survived an ICU stay and discharged directly home
FIGURE 2:
FIGURE 2:
Unadjusted count of rehabilitation visits per home health episode for Medicare beneficiaries who survived an ICU stay and discharged directly home, presented by Census Bureau region.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Adjusted negative binomial regression results presented as rate ratios (RRs) for the impact of each variable on rehabilitation utilization. RRs greater than 1 indicate a positive impact on number of rehabilitation visits received, and RRs less than 1 indicate a negative impact. Model was adjusted for all figure variables, and additionally for Census Bureau region and county-level count of home health agencies per 100,000 population.

References

    1. Connolly B, O’Neill B, Salisbury L, Blackwood B. Physical rehabilitation interventions for adult patients during critical illness: an overview of systematic reviews. Thorax. 2016;71(10):881–890. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferrante LE, Pisani MA, Murphy TE, Gahbauer EA, Leo-Summers LS, Gill TM. Factors Associated with Functional Recovery among Older Intensive Care Unit Survivors. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2016;194(3):299–307. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferrante LE, Pisani MA, Murphy TE, Gahbauer EA, Leo-Summers LS, Gill TM. Functional trajectories among older persons before and after critical illness. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2015;175(4):523–529. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mehlhorn J, Freytag A, Schmidt K, et al. Rehabilitation Interventions for Postintensive Care Syndrome: A Systematic Review*. Critical Care Medicine. 2014;42(5):1263–1271. - PubMed
    1. Prescott HC, Angus DC. Enhancing Recovery From Sepsis: A ReviewSepsis Recovery: Recognition and Management of Long-term SequelaeSepsis Recovery: Recognition and Management of Long-term Sequelae. JAMA. 2018;319(1):62–75. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types