Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 18;10(1):4944.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61720-w.

Severe maternal morbidity by mode of delivery in women with twin pregnancy and planned vaginal delivery

Affiliations

Severe maternal morbidity by mode of delivery in women with twin pregnancy and planned vaginal delivery

Diane Korb et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Planned vaginal delivery in twin pregnancies has three potential outcomes: vaginal or cesarean delivery of both twins, or cesarean for the second twin. Our objective was to assess the association between delivery mode and severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM) in women with twin pregnancies and planned vaginal deliveries. We limited this planned secondary analysis of the JUMODA cohort, a national prospective population-based study of twin deliveries, to women with planned vaginal delivery at or after 24 weeks of gestation who gave birth to two live fetuses at hospital. The association between delivery mode and SAMM was estimated from multivariate Poisson regression models. Of 5,055 women with planned vaginal delivery, 4,007 (79.3%) delivered both twins vaginally, 134 (2.6%) had cesarean for the second twin and 914 (18.1%) cesarean for both twins. Compared to vaginal delivery of both twins, the risk of SAMM was significantly higher after cesarean for the second twin (9.0% versus 4.5%; aRR 2.22, 95% CI 1.27-3.88) and for both twins (9.4% versus 4.5%, aRR 1.56, 95% CI 1.16-2.10). In twin pregnancies with planned vaginal delivery, cesarean deliveries for the second twin and for both twins are associated with higher risks of SAMM than vaginal delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blondel B, et al. Trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France from 1995 to 2016: Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2017;46:701–713. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.09.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E. & Osterman, M. J. K. Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980–2009. NCHS Data Brief 1–8 (2012). - PubMed
    1. Barrett JFR, et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:1295–1305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214939. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmitz T, et al. Association Between Planned Cesarean Delivery and Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity in Twin Pregnancies. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017;129:986–995. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002048. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Korb, D. et al. Risk of Severe Acute Maternal Morbidity According to Planned Mode of Delivery in Twin Pregnancies. Obstet. Gynecol., 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002788 (2018). - PubMed

Publication types