Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec:76:101783.
doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101783. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

Direct and Indirect Contributions of Executive Function to Word Decoding and Reading Comprehension in Kindergarten

Affiliations

Direct and Indirect Contributions of Executive Function to Word Decoding and Reading Comprehension in Kindergarten

Stephanie L Haft et al. Learn Individ Differ. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Extant research is increasingly recognizing the contribution of executive function (EF) to reading comprehension alongside established predictors like word decoding and oral language. The nature of the association between EF and reading comprehension is commonly investigated in older children and in those with reading impairments. However, less is known about this relationship in emerging readers in kindergarten, where word decoding and reading comprehension are highly intertwined. Moreover, a better understanding of the mechanisms by which EF influences reading comprehension is needed. The present study investigated direct contributions of EF to reading comprehension, as well as indirect contributions via word decoding in 97 kindergarteners. Results indicated that there was a significant indirect effect of EF on reading comprehension, with word decoding mediating this association. The direct contribution of EF to reading comprehension was not significant. Implications for reading instruction and intervention for early readers are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of interest: None.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Models linking EF, word decoding, and reading comprehension. Single headed arrows indicate direct relationships and double-headed arrows indicate covariance or correlation.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Path analytic model examining direct and indirect effects of EF on reading comprehension. Direct effects are in solid lines while the indirect effect is indicated by a dashed line. The effects of confounding variables (oral language, age) on study variables were controlled although only significant paths in the model are shown. Standardized beta coefficients with standard error in parentheses are noted for each path.

References

    1. Adlof SM, Hogan TP, & Catts HW (2005). Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities In The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 38–51). Psychology Press.
    1. Allison PD (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 545. - PubMed
    1. Arrington CN, Kulesz PA, Francis DJ, Fletcher JM, & Barnes MA (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(5), 325–346. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bentler PM, & Chou CP (1988). Practical issues around structural modeling. Common Problems Proper Solutions: Avoiding Error in Quantitative Research, 161–192.
    1. Blair C, & Razza RP (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78(2), 647–663. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x - DOI - PubMed