Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 1:2020:2356019.
doi: 10.1155/2020/2356019. eCollection 2020.

Dying in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU): A Retrospective Descriptive Analysis of Deaths in the ICU in a Communal Tertiary Hospital in Germany

Affiliations

Dying in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU): A Retrospective Descriptive Analysis of Deaths in the ICU in a Communal Tertiary Hospital in Germany

Esma Ay et al. Anesthesiol Res Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Modern intensive care methods led to an increased survival of critically ill patients over the last decades. But an unreflected application of modern intensive care measures might lead to prolonged treatment for incurable diseases, and an inadaequate or too aggressive therapy can prolong the dying process of patients. In this study, we analysed end-of-life decisions regarding withholding and withdrawal of intensive care measures in a German intensive care unit (ICU) of a communal tertiary hospital.

Methods: Patient datasets of all adult patients dying in an ICU or an intermediate care unit (IMC) in a tertiary communal hospital (Klinikum Hanau, Germany) between 01.01.2011 and 31.12.2012 were analysed for withholding and withdrawal of intensive care measures.

Results: During the two-year period, 1317 adult patients died in Klinikum Hanau. Of these, 489 (37%) died either in an ICU/IMC unit. The majority of those deceased patients (n = 427, 87%) was 60 years or older. In 306 (62%) of 489 patients, at least one life-sustaining measure was withheld or withdrawn. In 297 (61%) of 489 patients dying in ICU/IMC, any type of therapy was withheld, and in 139 patients (28%), any type of therapy was withdrawn. Mostly, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 427, 87%) was 60 years or older. In 306 (62%) of 489 patients, at least one life-sustaining measure was withheld or withdrawn. In 297 (61%) of 489 patients dying in ICU/IMC, any type of therapy was withheld, and in 139 patients (28%), any type of therapy was withdrawn. Mostly, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 427, 87%) was 60 years or older. In 306 (62%) of 489 patients, at least one life-sustaining measure was withheld or withdrawn. In 297 (61%) of 489 patients dying in ICU/IMC, any type of therapy was withheld, and in 139 patients (28%), any type of therapy was withdrawn. Mostly, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 427, 87%) was 60 years or older. In 306 (62%) of 489 patients, at least one life-sustaining measure was withheld or withdrawn. In 297 (61%) of 489 patients dying in ICU/IMC, any type of therapy was withheld, and in 139 patients (28%), any type of therapy was withdrawn. Mostly, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 427, 87%) was 60 years or older. In 306 (62%) of 489 patients, at least one life-sustaining measure was withheld or withdrawn. In 297 (61%) of 489 patients dying in ICU/IMC, any type of therapy was withheld, and in 139 patients (28%), any type of therapy was withdrawn. Mostly, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 427, 87%) was 60 years or older. In 306 (62%) of 489 patients, at least one life-sustaining measure was withheld or withdrawn. In 297 (61%) of 489 patients dying in ICU/IMC, any type of therapy was withheld, and in 139 patients (28%), any type of therapy was withdrawn. Mostly, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (.

Conclusions: About one-third of patients dying in the hospital died in ICU/IMC. At least one life-sustaining therapy was limited/withdrawn in more than 60% of those patients. Withholding of a therapy was more common than active therapy withdrawal. Ventilation and renal replacement therapy were withdrawn in less than 5% of patients, respectively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of patients for data analysis. N = number of patients; y = years; 52 patients were excluded after analysing data because in most cases they were formally classified as “dying in ICU/IMC” but died either outside the ICU/IMC or, e.g., under CPR while admitted on ICU/IMC.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time course after withholding or withdrawal of a life-sustaining therapy. The number of patients dying after withholding or withdrawal of a life-sustaining therapy is shown in bars. The percentage of patients who are still alive after withholding or withdrawal of therapy are plotted as lines.

References

    1. Angus D. C., Barnato A. E., Linde-Zwirble W. T., et al. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study∗. Critical Care Medicine. 2004;32(3):638–643. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000114816.62331.08. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lamas D. J., Owens R. L., Nace R. N., et al. Opening the door. Critical Care Medicine. 2017;45(4):e357–e362. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002094. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Federal Statistical Office. Elderly people in Germany and the European Union 2016—Ältere Menschen in Deutschland und der EU. Wiesbaden, Germany: Federal Statistical Office; 2016.
    1. Hillman K., Athari F., Forero R. States worse than death. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2018;24(5):415–420. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000529. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garrett J. M., Harris R. P., Norburn J. K., Patrick D. L., Danis M. Life-sustaining treatments during terminal illness. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1993;8(7):361–368. doi: 10.1007/bf02600073. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources