Barriers and solutions to implementing a pragmatic diabetes education trial in rural primary care clinics
- PMID: 32190781
- PMCID: PMC7068634
- DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100550
Barriers and solutions to implementing a pragmatic diabetes education trial in rural primary care clinics
Erratum in
-
Erratum regarding missing Declaration of Competing Interest statements in previously published articles.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Dec 10;20:100691. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100691. eCollection 2020 Dec. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020. PMID: 33392415 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this report is to describe barriers and solutions to the implementation and optimization of a pragmatic trial that tests an evidence-based, patient-centered, low literacy intervention promoting diabetes self-care in rural primary care clinics.
Methods: The two-arm pragmatic trial has been implemented in six rural family medicine clinics in Arkansas. It tests a self-management education and counseling intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes compared to enhanced usual care. Barriers and solutions were identified as issues arose and through interviews with clinic directors and clinic administrators and a focus group, interviews, and tracking reports with clinic health coaches who delivered the intervention.
Results: Barriers to optimizing enrollment, intervention delivery, and data collection were addressed through targeted education of and relationship building with leadership, changing enrollment oversight, and ongoing training of health coaches.
Conclusions: Successful implementation and optimization of this pragmatic clinical trial in rural primary care clinics was achieved through establishing common goals with clinic leadership, minimizing demands on clinic staff and administration, frequent contact and ongoing support of health coaches, and collaborative troubleshooting of issues with delivering the intervention.
Keywords: Diabetes; Health literacy; Patient-centered medical home; Pragmatic trial; Pragmatic trial optimization; Rural.
© 2020 The Author(s).
References
-
- American Diabetes Association Statistics about diabetes. 2018 March 22. http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/statistics/
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2014. Age-adjusted Rate Per 100 of Civilian, Noninstitutionalized Population with Diagnosed Diabetes, by Race, United States, 1980-2011.http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/prev/national/figbyrace.htm
-
- U.S.Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Promotion Healthy people 2020: diabetes. 2014. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/diabetes
-
- Keppel K.G., Pearcy J.N., Klein R.J., Measuring progress in Healthy People 2010 . National Center For Health Statistics; 2004. Healthy People 2010 Statistical Notes: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; pp. 1–16. (25) - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
