Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 19;8(2):193-198.
doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0023. Print 2021 May 26.

An estimate of missed pediatric sepsis in the emergency department

Christina L Cifra  1 , Erik Westlund  2 , Patrick Ten Eyck  3 , Marcia M Ward  4 , Nicholas M Mohr  1 , David A Katz  1   5
Affiliations

An estimate of missed pediatric sepsis in the emergency department

Christina L Cifra et al. Diagnosis (Berl). .

Abstract

Background: Timely diagnosis of pediatric sepsis remains elusive. We estimated the risk of potentially missed pediatric sepsis in US emergency departments (EDs) and determined factors associated with its occurrence.

Methods: In a retrospective study of linked inpatient and ED records from four states using administrative data (excluding 40% with missing identifiers), we identified children admitted with severe sepsis and/or septic shock who had at least one ED treat-and-release visit in the 7 days prior to sepsis admission. An expert panel rated the likelihood of each ED visit being related to subsequent sepsis admission. We used multivariable regression to identify associations with potentially missed sepsis.

Results: Of 1945 patients admitted with severe sepsis/septic shock, 158 [8.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 6.9%-9.4%] had potentially missed sepsis during an antecedent treat-and-release ED visit. The odds of potentially missed sepsis were lower for each additional comorbid chronic condition [odds ratio (OR), 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92] and higher in California (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.34-3.82), Florida (OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.95-5.70), and Massachusetts (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.35-6.09), compared to New York.

Conclusions: Administrative data can be used to screen large populations for potentially missed sepsis and identify cases that warrant detailed record review.

Keywords: diagnostic error; emergency department; misdiagnosis; pediatrics; sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Employment or leadership: No conflicts declared.

Competing Interests: No conflicts declared.

References

    1. Murphy SL, Mathews TJ, Martin JA, Minkovitz CS, Strobino DM. Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: 2013–2014. Pediatrics. 2017. June;139(6). - PubMed
    1. Hartman ME, Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC, Watson RS. Trends in the epidemiology of pediatric severe sepsis*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013. September;14(7):686–93. - PubMed
    1. Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, Friedrich ME, Iwashyna TJ, Phillips GS, et al. Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2017. 08;376(23):2235–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Damiani E, Donati A, Serafini G, Rinaldi L, Adrario E, Pelaia P, et al. Effect of performance improvement programs on compliance with sepsis bundles and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PloS One. 2015;10(5):e0125827. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liberman AL, Newman-Toker DE. Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE): a conceptual framework and methodological approach for unearthing misdiagnosis-related harms using big data. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018. July;27(7):557–66. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types