Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 17;17(6):1971.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061971.

Use of Electronic Cigarettes in European Populations: A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Use of Electronic Cigarettes in European Populations: A Narrative Review

A Kapan et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The increasing popularity of electronic cigarettes in past decades has aroused public health concern. This study aims to review the literature on the prevalence of e-cigarette use among the general adult and young populations in Europe. We searched Medline and Google Scholar from September 2019, and included "prevalence of e-cigarettes", "electronic cigarettes" or "e-cigarettes", and "electronic nicotine delivery system" or "vaping". The prevalence of current e-cigarette use ranged from 0.2% to 27%, ever-use ranged from 5.5% to 56.6% and daily use ranged from 1% to 2.9%. Current smokers of conventional cigarettes showed the highest prevalence for the use of e-cigarettes, ranging from 20.4% to 83.1%, followed by ex-smokers, with ranges from 7% to 15%. The following socio-demographic factors were associated with a higher chance of using e-cigarettes: male sex and younger age groups; results for economic status were inconclusive. In European countries, there is a higher prevalence of e-cigarette use among males, adolescents and young adults, smokers of conventional cigarettes, and former smokers.

Keywords: current and ever-use; e-cigarettes; prevalence; trend.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding institution had no role in the interpretation of the data or in the writing of the manuscript.

References

    1. Caponnetto P., Campagna D., Papale G., Russo C., Polosa R. The emerging phenomenon of electronic cigarettes. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2012;6:63–74. doi: 10.1586/ers.11.92. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim J.J., Sabatelli N., Tutak W., Giuseppetti A., Frukhtbeyn S., Shaffer I., Wilhide J., Routkevitch D., Ondov J.M. Universal electronic-cigarette test: Physiochemical characterization of reference e-liquid. Tob. Induc. Dis. 2017;15:14. doi: 10.1186/s12971-017-0119-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Breland A.B., Spindle T., Weaver M., Eissenberg T. Science and electronic cigarettes: Current data, future needs. J. Addict. Med. 2014;8:223–233. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000049. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartmann-Boyce J., McRobbie H., Bullen C., Begh R., Stead L.F., Hajek P. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016;9:Cd010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bullen C., Howe C., Laugesen M., McRobbie H., Parag V., Williman J., Walker N. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382:1629–1637. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61842-5. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types