Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2020 Mar 19;11(1):1471.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15306-9.

Electronic metal-support interactions in vacuum vs. electrolyte

Affiliations
Comment

Electronic metal-support interactions in vacuum vs. electrolyte

Tobias Binninger. Nat Commun. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Electrostatic conditions around a supported Pt nanoparticle in electrochemical environment.
a Schematic cell used to derive Eq. (1) with Pt/Support electrode, electrolyte, and reference electrode (Ref). For ease of derivation and without loss of generality, the reference electrode metal M is considered to form a dense layer on a substrate of the same support material. The inner electrostatic potentials of different phases i are denoted by Φi. b Interface charging at the Pt/Support electrode in a strongly screening electrolyte, i.e. for wdl ≪ dPt, at the PZC EqPt=0PtSup, i.e. for zero charge on the external Pt nanoparticle surface in contact with the electrolyte. Negative ions of the electrolyte are depicted by circles with negative signs inside. EMSI charge transfer is confined to the direct support–Pt interface, and it closes the “gap” in the electrochemical double layer of the support at the place of the Pt nanoparticle. The external Pt nanoparticle surface is screened by the strong electrolyte from the support interface, and thus its PZC is the same as for an unsupported Pt electrode.

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. Schwab G-M, Block J, Schultze D. Kontaktkatalytische Verstärkung durch dotierte Träger. Angew. Chem. 1959;71:101–104. doi: 10.1002/ange.19590710303. - DOI
    1. Lin X, et al. Charge-mediated adsorption behavior of CO on MgO-supported Au clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:7745–7749. doi: 10.1021/ja101188x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ho VTT, Pan C-J, Rick J, Su W-N, Hwang B-J. Nanostructured Ti0.7Mo0.3O2 support enhances electron transfer to Pt: high-performance catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:11716–11724. doi: 10.1021/ja2039562. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campbell CT. Electronic perturbations. Nat. Chem. 2012;4:597–598. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1412. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Binninger T, Schmidt TJ, Kramer D. Capacitive electronic metal-support interactions: outer surface charging of supported catalyst particles. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:165405. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.165405. - DOI