Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Mar 19;10(1):5003.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61815-4.

In-line filtration in very preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

In-line filtration in very preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial

Anne-Laure Virlouvet et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

In-line filtration is increasingly used in critically-ill infants but its benefits, by preventing micro-particle infusion in very preterm neonates, remain to be demonstrated. We conducted a randomized controlled trial among very preterm infants allocated to receive either in-line filtration of all the intra-venous lines or standard care without filters. The primary outcome was differences greater than 20% in the median changes in pro-inflammatory cytokine serum concentrations measured at day 3 and day 8 (+/-1) using a Luminex multianalytic profiling technique. Major neonatal complications were analyzed as secondary predefined outcomes. We randomized 146 infants, assigned to filter (n = 73) or control (n = 73) group. Difference over 20% in pro-inflammatory cytokine concentration between day 3 and day 8 was not found statistically different between the two groups, both in intent-to-treat (with imputation) and per protocol (without imputation) analyses. The incidences of most of neonatal complications were found to be similar. Hence, this trial did not evidence a beneficial effect of in-line filtration in very preterm infants on the inflammatory response syndrome and neonatal morbidities. These data should be interpreted according to local standards in infusion preparation and central line management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Andreas Capewell is an employee of Pall Medical, SLS, Dreieich, Germany. The other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time course of pro-inflammatory cytokine serum concentrations between birth and Day 30, in per protocol (A) and intend-to-treat (B) analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of patients according to their cumulative morbidities recorded before discharge.

References

    1. Ancel PY, et al. Survival and morbidity of preterm children born at 22 through 34 weeks’ gestation in France in 2011: results of the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:230–238. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3351. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dammann O, Leviton A. Inflammatory brain damage in preterm newborns–dry numbers, wet lab, and causal inferences. Early Hum. Dev. 2004;79:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.04.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dammann O, et al. Duration of Systemic Inflammation in the First Postnatal Month Among Infants Born Before the 28th Week of Gestation. Inflamm. 2016;39:672–677. doi: 10.1007/s10753-015-0293-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Volpe JJ. Postnatal sepsis, necrotizing entercolitis, and the critical role of systemic inflammation in white matter injury in premature infants. J. Pediatr. 2008;153:160–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.04.057. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuban KCK, et al. Association of Circulating Proinflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Protein Biomarkers in Extremely Preterm Born Children with Subsequent Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Volumes and Cognitive Function at Age 10 Years. J. Pediatr. 2019;210:81–90 e83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.03.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types