Commentary on 'Comparison of the safety and efficacy of single-stage endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus two-stage ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy six-to eight weeks later: A randomized controlled trial' (Int J Surg 2020;76:37-44)
- PMID: 32194254
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.015
Commentary on 'Comparison of the safety and efficacy of single-stage endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus two-stage ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy six-to eight weeks later: A randomized controlled trial' (Int J Surg 2020;76:37-44)
Keywords: Cholangitis; Choledocholithiasis; Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography; Endoscopic stone removal; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest None.
Comment on
-
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of single-stage endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus two-stage ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy six-to-eight weeks later: A randomized controlled trial.Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.021. Epub 2020 Feb 24. Int J Surg. 2020. PMID: 32105889 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
