Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: A randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 32195952
- PMCID: PMC7220115
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019514
Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Introduction: Low back pain is a chronic recurrent symptom, which can lower the patient's quality of life. With technological development of automated home massage systems, now offers a promising alternative to physiotherapy. However, thus far, the effectiveness of such methods has not been evaluated. We aimed to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a massage chair with those of conventional physiotherapy for the treatment.
Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial with a two-group parallel design. Following randomization and allocation, 56 participants were enrolled to receive either physiotherapy (n = 25) or mechanical massage using the massage chair (n = 31). Pain severity was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) and satisfaction assessed with the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Quality of life modification was analyzed using the Functional Rating Index (FRI). Cost-effectiveness was analyzed by comparing the sum of physiotherapy fees and monthly rental fees for chair massage.
Results: Physiotherapy and massage chair were both effective for pain control as assessed with the VAS (P < .001), satisfaction as assessed by MPQ (P < .001) and life quality improvement as assessed by FRI (P < .001) in both groups. Both VAS and FRI scores were significantly higher for physiotherapy than for massage chair (P = .03 and P = .03, respectively). There was no significant difference in MPQ between the two groups. Massage chair therapy was more cost-effective than physiotherapy, at only 60.17% of the physiotherapy cost (P < .001).
Conclusions: The home massage chair system was cost-effective, but pain control and disability improved more with physiotherapy. However, our results showed that the massage chair is a promising treatment for pain control and quality of life modification, but efficacy is still superior in physiotherapy and the chair is not a replacement for physiotherapy.
Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0003157. Retrospectively registered August 2, 2018.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 1999;354:581–5. - PubMed
-
- Rashid AA, Devaraj NK, Kahar JA. Patellofemoral pain: a not so trivial knee injury (a case report). Int J Hum Health Sci 2019;3:120–2.
-
- Hahne AJ, Ford JJ, Surkitt LD, et al. Individualized physical therapy is cost-effective compared with guideline-based advice for people with low back disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42:E169–76. - PubMed
-
- Crow WT, Willis DR. Estimating cost of care for patients with acute low back pain: a retrospective review of patient records. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2009;109:229–33. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical