Prediction of the Binding Affinities and Selectivity for CB1 and CB2 Ligands Using Homology Modeling, Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and MM-PBSA Binding Free Energy Calculations
- PMID: 32196303
- DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00696
Prediction of the Binding Affinities and Selectivity for CB1 and CB2 Ligands Using Homology Modeling, Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and MM-PBSA Binding Free Energy Calculations
Abstract
Cannabinoids are a group of chemical compounds that have been used for thousands of years due to their psychoactive function and systemic physiological effects. There are at least two types of cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, which belong to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and can trigger different signaling pathways to exert their physiological functions. In this study, several representative agonists and antagonists of both CB1 and CB2 were systematically studied to predict their binding affinities and selectivity against both cannabinoid receptors using a set of hierarchical molecular modeling and simulation techniques, including homology modeling, molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and end point binding free energy calculations using the molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area-WSAS (MM-PBSA-WSAS) method, and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA) free energy decomposition. Encouragingly, the calculated binding free energies correlated very well with the experimental values and the correlation coefficient square (R2), 0.60, was much higher than that of an efficient but less accurate docking scoring function (R2 = 0.37). The hotspot residues for CB1 and CB2 in both active and inactive conformations were identified via MM-GBSA free energy decomposition analysis. The comparisons of binding free energies, ligand-receptor interaction patterns, and hotspot residues among the four systems, namely, agonist-bound CB1, agonist-bound CB2, antagonist-bound CB1, and antagonist-bound CB2, enabled us to investigate and identify distinct binding features of these four systems, with which one can rationally design potent, selective, and function-specific modulators for the cannabinoid receptors.
Keywords: Cannabinoid receptors; binding free energy; free energy decomposition; molecular dynamics simulations; molecular mechanisms; multiscale molecular modeling; rational drug design.
Similar articles
-
A head-to-head comparison of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA in predicting binding affinities for the CB1 cannabinoid ligands.J Mol Model. 2024 Oct 31;30(11):390. doi: 10.1007/s00894-024-06189-4. J Mol Model. 2024. PMID: 39480515
-
Virtual screening using docking and molecular dynamics of cannabinoid analogs against CB1 and CB2 receptors.Comput Biol Chem. 2021 Dec;95:107590. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2021.107590. Epub 2021 Oct 12. Comput Biol Chem. 2021. PMID: 34700256
-
Cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor ligand specificity and the development of CB2-selective agonists.Curr Med Chem. 2008;15(14):1428-43. doi: 10.2174/092986708784567716. Curr Med Chem. 2008. PMID: 18537620 Review.
-
Exploring the Ligand Efficacy of Cannabinoid Receptor 1 (CB1) using Molecular Dynamics Simulations.Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 13;8(1):13787. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31749-z. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30213978 Free PMC article.
-
Tricyclic Pyrazole-Based Compounds as Useful Scaffolds for Cannabinoid CB1/CB2 Receptor Interaction.Molecules. 2021 Apr 7;26(8):2126. doi: 10.3390/molecules26082126. Molecules. 2021. PMID: 33917187 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding the role of the CB1 toggle switch in interaction networks using molecular dynamics simulation.Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 16;11(1):22369. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01767-5. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34785728 Free PMC article.
-
A head-to-head comparison of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA in predicting binding affinities for the CB1 cannabinoid ligands.J Mol Model. 2024 Oct 31;30(11):390. doi: 10.1007/s00894-024-06189-4. J Mol Model. 2024. PMID: 39480515
-
In silico studies on stilbenolignan analogues as SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors.Chem Phys Lett. 2021 May 16;771:138563. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2021.138563. Epub 2021 Mar 22. Chem Phys Lett. 2021. PMID: 33776065 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Advances in Endocannabinoid System Targeting for Improved Specificity: Strategic Approaches to Targeted Drug Delivery.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 30;23(21):13223. doi: 10.3390/ijms232113223. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36362014 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mechanistic Understanding from Molecular Dynamics in Pharmaceutical Research 2: Lipid Membrane in Drug Design.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;14(10):1062. doi: 10.3390/ph14101062. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34681286 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources