Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May 28:36:364-370.

Benefits of CT Scanning for the Management of Hip Arthritis and Arthroplasty

Affiliations
  • PMID: 32196566
Review

Benefits of CT Scanning for the Management of Hip Arthritis and Arthroplasty

Hytham S Salem et al. Surg Technol Int. .

Abstract

Introduction: Imaging studies for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty (THA) are typically obtained by two-dimensional (2D) anteroposterior radiographs. However, CT imaging has proven to be a valuable tool that may be more accurate than standard radiographs. The purpose of this review was to report on the current literature to assess the utility of CT imaging for preoperative planning of THA. Specifically, we assessed its utility in the evaluation of: 1) hip arthritis; 2) femoral head osteonecrosis; 3) implant size prediction; 4) component alignment; 5) limb length evaluation; and 6) radiation exposure.

Materials and methods: A literature search was performed using search terms "computed tomography", "radiograph", "joint" "alignment", "hip," and "arthroplasty". Our initial search returned a total of 562 results. After applying our criteria, 26 studies were included.

Results: CT scans were found to be more accurate than radiographs in predicting implant size and alignment preoperatively and provide improved visualization of extraarticular deformities that may be essential to consider when planning a THA. Although radiation is a potential concern, newer imaging protocols have minimized the radiation to levels comparable to x-ray.

Conclusion: The current literature suggests that CT has several advantages over radiographs for preoperative planning of THA including more accurate planning of implant size, component alignment, and postoperative leg length. It is also superior to x-ray in identifying extraarticular hip deformities using the minimum effective dose for CT and the minimum scan length required by templating software. The radiation can be reduced to values similar to radiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources