Optimal high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level for decreasing benign prostatic hyperplasia in men not taking statin medication: A historical cohort study
- PMID: 32196725
- DOI: 10.1002/pros.23970
Optimal high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level for decreasing benign prostatic hyperplasia in men not taking statin medication: A historical cohort study
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the optimal high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) prevention in men not taking statin medication using a large historical cohort.
Methods: We initially selected 130 454 men who underwent health checkups in 2009 from the National Health Information Database of the National Health Insurance Service. After excluding 36 854 men with BPH in 2009, and 45 061 men for statin use, 48 539 men were ultimately included in the analysis. A Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the optimal high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level for preventing BPH.
Results: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were less than 40 mg/dL in 7431 (15.3%) men, 40 to 49 in 15 861 (32.7%), 50 to 59 in 15 328 (27.5%), and greater than or equal to 60 in 11 919 (24.6%). The overall cumulative incidence of BPH was 4.4%, 8.7%, 13.0%, and 17.8% at the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year follow-up periods, respectively. In multivariable analysis, high-density lipoprotein greater than or equal to 60 mg/dL were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of BPH, as were age, residence, income, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, triglyceride, and increased annual clinic visits, especially in men in their 40s.
Conclusion: Elevated serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were negatively associated with BPH incidence. In addition, maintaining high-density lipoprotein greater than or equal to 60 mg/dL was associated with a decreased BPH incidence compared with high-density lipoprotein less than 40 mg/dL, especially in men in their 40s.
Keywords: cohort studies; dyslipidemia; metabolic syndrome X; prostatic hyperplasia; urination.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.J Urol. 2021 Mar;205(3):902-905. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001543. Epub 2020 Dec 23. J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33356455 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Verhamme KMC, Dieleman JP, Triumph Pan European Expert Panel, et al. Incidence and prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in primary care-The Triumph project. Eur Urol. 2002;42(4):323-328.
-
- McVary KT. BPH: epidemiology and comorbidities. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(5 suppl):S122-S128.
-
- Coyne KS, Wein AJ, Tubaro A, et al. The burden of lower urinary tract symptoms: evaluating the effect of LUTS on health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression: EpiLUTS. BJU Int. 2009;103:4-11.
-
- Kupelian V, Wei JT, O'Leary MP, et al. Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms and effect on quality of life in a racially and ethnically diverse random sample: the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) survey. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(21):2381-2387.
-
- Speakman M, Kirby R, Doyle S, Ioannou C. Burden of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-Focus on the UK. BJU Int. 2015;115(4):508-519.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical