Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jul;20(6):656-675.
doi: 10.1111/papr.12885. Epub 2020 May 21.

The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Patients With Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Meghan M Ahern  1 , Lindsay V Dean  1 , Carolyn C Stoddard  1 , Aakriti Agrawal  1 , Kimin Kim  1 , Chad E Cook  2 , Alessandra Narciso Garcia  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Patients With Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Meghan M Ahern et al. Pain Pract. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Virtual reality (VR) technologies have been shown to be beneficial in various areas of health care; to date, there are no systematic reviews examining the effectiveness of VR technology for the treatment of spinal pain.

Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of VR technology in the management of individuals with acute, subacute, and chronic spinal pain.

Methods: Six electronic databases were searched until November 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of VR were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias for each study and the overall quality of evidence. Mean differences of outcomes were pooled as appropriate using random-effects models.

Results: Seven RCTs with high risk of bias met review criteria. Quality of evidence ranged from very low to low quality. In patients with chronic neck pain, VR improved global perceived effect (GPE), satisfaction, and general health at short-term follow-up, as well as general health and balance at intermediate-term follow-up compared to kinematic training. VR improved pain intensity and disability at short-term and long-term follow-up compared to conventional proprioceptive training in patients with chronic neck pain. In patients with either subacute or chronic low back pain (LBP), VR improved pain, disability, and fear of movement compared to lumbar stabilization exercises and improved pain compared to conventional physical therapy (at short-term follow-up). In patients with chronic LBP, VR improved pain compared to lumbar stabilization exercises and improved fear of movement compared to conventional physical therapy (at short-term follow-up).

Conclusion: VR's potential for improvement in outcomes for spinal pain that demonstrated statistical and/or clinical significance (pain intensity, disability, fear of movement, GPE, patient satisfaction, general health status, and balance) highlights the need for more focused, higher-quality research on the efficacy and effectiveness of VR for treatment of patients with spinal pain.

Keywords: back pain; cervical pain; low back pain; physical therapy; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mahrer NE, Gold JI. The use of virtual reality for pain control: a review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009;13:100-109.
    1. Keefe FJ, Huling DA, Coggins MJ, et al. Virtual reality for persistent pain: a new direction for behavioral pain management. Pain. 2012;153:2163-2166.
    1. Trost Z, Zielke M, Guck A, et al. The promise and challenge of virtual gaming technologies for chronic pain: the case of graded exposure for low back pain. Pain Manag. 2015;5:197-206.
    1. Andreae MH. Virtual reality in rehabilitation. BMJ. 1996;312:4-5.
    1. Murray CD, Patchick EL, Caillette F, Howard T, Pettifer S. Can immersive virtual reality reduce phantom limb pain? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;119:407-412.