Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 20;19(1):40.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-1135-7.

Mobile health clinics in the United States

Affiliations

Mobile health clinics in the United States

Nelson C Malone et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background: Mobile health clinics serve an important role in the health care system, providing care to some of the most vulnerable populations. Mobile Health Map is the only comprehensive database of mobile clinics in the United States. Members of this collaborative research network and learning community supply information about their location, services, target populations, and costs. They also have access to tools to measure, improve, and communicate their impact.

Methods: We analyzed data from 811 clinics that participated in Mobile Health Map between 2007 and 2017 to describe the demographics of the clients these clinics serve, the services they provide, and mobile clinics' affiliated institutions and funding sources.

Results: Mobile clinics provide a median number of 3491 visits annually. More than half of their clients are women (55%) and racial/ethnic minorities (59%). Of the 146 clinics that reported insurance data, 41% of clients were uninsured while 44% had some form of public insurance. The most common service models were primary care (41%) and prevention (47%). With regards to organizational affiliations, they vary from independent (33%) to university affiliated (24%), while some (29%) are part of a hospital or health care system. Most mobile clinics receive some financial support from philanthropy (52%), while slightly less than half (45%) receive federal funds.

Conclusion: Mobile health care delivery is an innovative model of health services delivery that provides a wide variety of services to vulnerable populations. The clinics vary in service mix, patient demographics, and relationships with the fixed health system. Although access to care has increased in recent years through the Affordable Care Act, barriers continue to persist, particularly among populations living in resource-limited areas. Mobile clinics can improve access by serving as a vital link between the community and clinical facilities. Additional work is needed to advance availability of this important resource.

Keywords: Health care access; Health disparities; Mobile clinics; Mobile health unit; Population health; Social determinants of health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declare(s) that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screenshot of portion of New Clinic Entry form
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mobile Health Clinics Affiliations. 286 clinics report on the affiliations or parent organizations. *Clinics may designate multiple affiliations
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Reported Sources of Funding for Clinics. 281 clinics report on the sources of their funding. *Clinics may choose multiple sources of support
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Two hundred ninety-one mobile clinics report on the specific groups they target. *Clinics may select more than one option
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Services Reported by Mobile Clinics. 724 clinics reported on the serve type of their clinic. The “other specialty” category includes vision, asthma, maternal and infant health, disaster, homelessness, and other services
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mobile Health Clinics Operating in the United States of America. This figure is a May 2017 screenshot of mobile clinics mapped by MobileHealthMap.org with 811 clinics representing all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other nations globally. The red markers denote a single clinic. Circles represent a concentration of clinics (blue: < 10, yellow: 10+)

References

    1. Poon SJ, Schuur JD, Mehrotra A. Trends in visits to acute care venues for treatment of low-acuity conditions in the United States from 2008 to 2015. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(10):1342–1349. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnett ML, Ray KN, Souza J, Mehrotra A. Trends in telemedicine use in a large commercially insured population, 2005-2017. JAMA. 2018;320(20):2147–2149. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12354. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yu SWY, Hill C, Ricks ML, Bennet J, Oriol NE. The scope and impact of mobile health clinics in the United States: a literature review. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16:178. 10.1186/s12939-017-0671-2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sommers BD. Health care Reform’s unfinished work — remaining barriers to coverage and access. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(25):2395–2397. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1509462. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clark CR, Soukup J, Govindarajulu U, Riden HE, Tovar DA, Johnson PA. Lack of access due to costs remains a problem for some in Massachusetts despite the State’s health reforms. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30(2):247–255. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0319. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources