Value of Information Analytical Methods: Report 2 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force
- PMID: 32197720
- PMCID: PMC7373630
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.004
Value of Information Analytical Methods: Report 2 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force
Abstract
The allocation of healthcare resources among competing priorities requires an assessment of the expected costs and health effects of investing resources in the activities and of the opportunity cost of the expenditure. To date, much effort has been devoted to assessing the expected costs and health effects, but there remains an important need to also reflect the consequences of uncertainty in resource allocation decisions and the value of further research to reduce uncertainty. Decision making with uncertainty may turn out to be suboptimal, resulting in health loss. Consequently, there may be value in reducing uncertainty, through the collection of new evidence, to better inform resource decisions. This value can be quantified using value of information (VOI) analysis. This report from the ISPOR VOI Task Force describes methods for computing 4 VOI measures: the expected value of perfect information, expected value of partial perfect information (EVPPI), expected value of sample information (EVSI), and expected net benefit of sampling (ENBS). Several methods exist for computing EVPPI and EVSI, and this report provides guidance on selecting the most appropriate method based on the features of the decision problem. The report provides a number of recommendations for good practice when planning, undertaking, or reviewing VOI analyses. The software needed to compute VOI is discussed, and areas for future research are highlighted.
Keywords: ENBS; EVPI; EVPPI; EVSI; decision making; study design; value of information; value of research.
Copyright © 2020 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
A Step Closer to Better Research Prioritization? The ISPOR Value of Information Task Force Reports.Value Health. 2020 Mar;23(3):287-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Feb 25. Value Health. 2020. PMID: 32197721 No abstract available.
References
-
- Fenwick E, Steuten L, Knies S, Ghabri S, Basu A, Murray J, et al. Value of Information Analysis for Research Decisions - An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value in Health. ?;?(?). - PubMed
-
- Briggs AH, Weinstein MC, Fenwick E, Karnon J, Sculpher M, Paltiel D. Model parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis: A report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-6. Value in Health. 2012;15:835–842. - PubMed
-
- Briggs AH, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
-
- Aspinall WP, Cooke RM. Quantifying scientific uncertainty from expert judgement elicitation. Risk and Uncertainty Assessment for Natural Hazards. Cambridge University Press; 2013.
-
- O’Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser JR, Garthwaite PH, Jenkinson DJ, et al. Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Expert Probabilities. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2006.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
