Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 20:368:l6927.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6927.

Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for patient benefit: 20 critical questions on transparency, replicability, ethics, and effectiveness

Affiliations

Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for patient benefit: 20 critical questions on transparency, replicability, ethics, and effectiveness

Sebastian Vollmer et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Machine learning, artificial intelligence, and other modern statistical methods are providing new opportunities to operationalise previously untapped and rapidly growing sources of data for patient benefit. Despite much promising research currently being undertaken, particularly in imaging, the literature as a whole lacks transparency, clear reporting to facilitate replicability, exploration for potential ethical concerns, and clear demonstrations of effectiveness. Among the many reasons why these problems exist, one of the most important (for which we provide a preliminary solution here) is the current lack of best practice guidance specific to machine learning and artificial intelligence. However, we believe that interdisciplinary groups pursuing research and impact projects involving machine learning and artificial intelligence for health would benefit from explicitly addressing a series of questions concerning transparency, reproducibility, ethics, and effectiveness (TREE). The 20 critical questions proposed here provide a framework for research groups to inform the design, conduct, and reporting; for editors and peer reviewers to evaluate contributions to the literature; and for patients, clinicians and policy makers to critically appraise where new findings may deliver patient benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: We have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and declare the following interests: GSC and KGMM are part of the TRIPOD steering group. GSC is director of the UK EQUATOR Centre. The remaining authors have no additional declarations.

References

    1. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, et al. CADET II Group . Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1675-84. 10.1056/NEJMoa0803545 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rajkomar A, Oren E, Chen K, et al. . Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records. Digital Med 2018;1:18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsigelny IF. Artificial intelligence in drug combination therapy. Brief Bioinform 2019;20:1434-48. - PubMed
    1. Carney S. Report of the NW London CCGs’ collaboration board. November 2017. https://www.centrallondonccg.nhs.uk/media/70538/150-updated-with-clarifi...
    1. De Fauw J, Ledsam JR, Romera-Paredes B, et al. . Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease. Nat Med 2018;24:1342-50. 10.1038/s41591-018-0107-6 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources