Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 20;11(1):1491.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15292-y.

The mechanism of a high-affinity allosteric inhibitor of the serotonin transporter

Affiliations

The mechanism of a high-affinity allosteric inhibitor of the serotonin transporter

Per Plenge et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

The serotonin transporter (SERT) terminates serotonin signaling by rapid presynaptic reuptake. SERT activity is modulated by antidepressants, e.g., S-citalopram and imipramine, to alleviate symptoms of depression and anxiety. SERT crystal structures reveal two S-citalopram binding pockets in the central binding (S1) site and the extracellular vestibule (S2 site). In this study, our combined in vitro and in silico analysis indicates that the bound S-citalopram or imipramine in S1 is allosterically coupled to the ligand binding to S2 through altering protein conformations. Remarkably, SERT inhibitor Lu AF60097, the first high-affinity S2-ligand reported and characterized here, allosterically couples the ligand binding to S1 through a similar mechanism. The SERT inhibition by Lu AF60097 is demonstrated by the potentiated imipramine binding and increased hippocampal serotonin level in rats. Together, we reveal a S1-S2 coupling mechanism that will facilitate rational design of high-affinity SERT allosteric inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Experimental evidence for allosteric binding between the S1 and S2 sites in SERT.
a Chemical structure of the tested drugs. Left: imipramine (IMI). Right: R(−)- and S(+)-citalopram (R-CIT and S-CIT, respectively). b Allosteric potency of S-CIT measured as concentration-dependent inhibition of either [3H]IMI or [3H]S-CIT dissociation, prebound to SERT prior to the addition of S-CIT in the indicated concentrations. Data plotted as inhibition of [3H]ligand dissociation rate by S-CIT relative to no S-CIT added (ctrl). Prebound [3H]S-CIT (triangles) results in a 29-fold increase in S-CIT allosteric potency relative to prebound [3H]IMI (circles), with IC50 = 5.1 [4.6, 5.8] µM and 152 [125, 185] µM, respectively (mean [S.E. interval], n = 3). c Allosteric potency of R-CIT measured as in (b). Here R-CIT possesses a fourfold higher allosteric potency for prebound [3H]IMI relative to prebound [3H]S-CIT, with IC50 = 5.3 [4.9; 5.8] µM and 21.5 [20.3; 22.7] µM, respectively (mean [S.E. interval], n = 3–6). d Allosteric potency of S-CIT (blue) and R-CIT (green) in SERT E494Q predicted to dissipate the allosteric interaction between S1 and S2 sites. The allosteric potency is now collapsed around the observed allosteric potency for S-CIT inhibition of [3H]IMI dissociation (right dotted line) in SERT WT. The allosteric potency of S-CIT (blue) for inhibition of [3H]S-CIT (triangles) and [3H]IMI (circles) dissociation in E494Q is 64.8 [56.6; 74.1] µM and 131 [123; 140] µM, respectively (mean [S.E. interval], n = 5–6). The same values for R-CIT are 137 [118; 158] µM and 199 [191; 207] µM, respectively (mean [S.E. interval], n = 5). Left dotted line is allosteric potency for S-CIT with prebound [3H]S-CIT from (b), shown for comparison. e Allosteric potency for S-CIT with prebound [3H]S-CIT (triangles) or [3H]IMI (circles) in SERT T497A. Thr497 is predicted to mediate the S1:S2 allosteric interaction (see Fig. 2). The IC50 is collapsed, around the allosteric potency for [3H]S-CIT dissociation from SERT WT (dotted lines); IC50 for S-CIT: 5.10 [3.20; 8.00] µM and 8.80 [5.90; 13.4] µM for inhibition of [3H]S-CIT and [3H]IMI dissociation, respectively. The same values for R-CIT are 17.8 [15.7; 20.2] and 11.6 [10.1; 13.3], respectively (mean [S.E. interval], n = 3). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. MD simulations of the allosteric interaction between SERT S1 and S1 sites.
In the presence of S1:S-CIT the Thr497 χ1 dihedral is mostly shifted towards gauche−, whereas in the presence of S1:IMI, it is in gauche+, which in turn affects the salt bridge interaction between S2:S-CIT and Glu494. In all panels, the S1:S-CIT conditions are colored in salmon, whereas the S1:IMI conditions are in purple. a A zoomed-out view of the 5I73 structure showing the S1 and S2 sites. b A zoomed-in view of the equilibrated model of WT S1:S-CIT/S2:apo, c S1:S-CIT/S2:S-CIT, d S1:IMI/S2:apo, and e S1:IMI/S2:S-CIT. g Distribution of the Thr497 χ1 rotamer for S1:S-CIT/S2:apo, S1:IMI/S2:apo (dotted lines), and S1:S-CIT/S2:S-CIT and S1:IMI/S2:S-CIT (solid lines) conditions. h Distribution of the Glu494/S2:S-CIT distance (minimum distance between the charged N of S2:S-CIT and the two carboxyl oxygens of Glu494) for S1:S-CIT/S2:S-CIT and S1:IMI/S2:S-CIT conditions. i S2:S-CIT is more stable in the presence of S1:S-CIT (salmon) than in the presence of S1:IMI (purple) measured by pairwise ligand RMSDs (see “Methods”).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Identification of high-affinity allosteric inhibitors for SERT.
a Chemical structure of three tested compounds, all based on S-CIT template with an amide instead of the cyano in S-CIT. They differ in having either none (AE), one (Lu AF60097) or two (AF) double bonds (stippled circles) in their N-substituent. b The allosteric potency of the compounds inhibiting the dissociation of [3H]S-CIT is within the micromolar range: Lu AF60097 (red), IC50 = 6.50 [5.07; 8.31] µM; AF (brown), IC50 = 10.4 [8.45; 12.9] µM; and AE (black), IC50 = 33.8 [30.7; 37.3] µM. Data are mean [S.E. interval], n = 3-5. c The allosteric potency increases to nanomolar concentrations when assessed by inhibition of [3H]IMI dissociation. IC50 values (in nM) for Lu AF60097, AF and AE are 31.4 [25.2; 39.1], 192 [173; 215], and 119 [103; 138], respectively (mean [S.E. interval], n = 3–6. d A zoomed-in view of S1:IMI (in purple)/S2:Lu AF60097 (in green), and e S1:S-CIT (in salmon)/S2:Lu AF60097 (in green) conditions. f Distribution of the Thr497 χ1 rotamer for S1:S-CIT/S2:Lu AF60097 (salmon) and S1:IMI/S2:Lu AF60097 (purple) conditions. g Distribution of the Glu494/S2:Lu AF60097 distance (minimum distance between the charged N of Lu AF60097 and the two carboxyl oxygens of Glu494) for S1:S-CIT/S2:Lu AF60097 (salmon) and S1:IMI/S2:Lu AF60097 (purple) conditions. Experiments in b and c are performed essentially as in Fig. 1 on membrane preparations from COS-7 cells transiently transfected with SERT WT. Data are shown as means ± SEM (error bars). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Evidence for binding of Lu AF60097 to the extracellular vestibule in SERT.
a A two-dimensional ligand interaction diagram showing the residues interacting with Lu AF60097 that have >50% interaction frequencies (see Supplementary Table 3). b Effect of SERT point mutations on Lu AF60097 allosteric potency measured as inhibition of [3H]IMI dissociation (dotted line represents effect on SERT WT for comparison). The mutations are proposed to be located to the S2 site. The mutations cause a 14- to 293-fold decrease in S2:Lu AF60097 affinity (Table 2), with F556R not possessing any measurable affinity (IC50 ≥ 10,000 nM). Allosteric potency on SERT WT is shown as dotted line. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (error bars), n = 3–6. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Pharmacologic properties of Lu AF60097 binding to SERT.
a Inhibition of [3H]5-HT uptake by Lu AF60097 in SERT WT and F556R. Intact COS-7 cells were pre-incubated with Lu AF60097 for 15 min before [3H]5-HT uptake was initiated. b Lu AF60097 inhibits [3H]5-HT uptake with a mixture of competitive and non-competitive mechanisms. Saturation uptake experiments for [3H]5-HT transport as a function of increasing Lu AF60097 concentrations (0–640 nM). The VMAX decreases with increasing Lu AF60097 (from 1180 ± 20 fmol/min (no Lu AF60097) to 920 ± 20 fmol/min (640 nM Lu AF60097). In addition, the KM-value for 5-HT increases with increasing concentration of Lu AF60097 (KM = 484 nM and 1650 nM for buffer only and 640 nM Lu AF60097, respectively (Supplementary Table 4). c Application of Lu AF60097 and imipramine together inhibits [3H]5-HT uptake synergistically. Imipramine (4 nM) and Lu AF60097 (27 nM) results in a minor inhibition of [3H]5-HT uptake (to 89.3 ± 0.8 and 94 ± 2% of control, respectively). In contrast, adding the same concentration of the two compounds together results in a significantly higher decrease of [3H]5-HT uptake (64.8 ± 0.3%). ****p < 0.001 relative to addition of either imipramine or Lu AF60097 alone (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). All experiments are performed on intact COS-7 cells transiently transfected with SERT WT. Data are shown as means ± SEM (error bars) of at least three experiments performed in triplicates. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Effects of Lu AF60097 and imipramine on 5-HT levels in rat hippocampus.
a Changes in extracellular 5-HT levels after injection (dotted line) of 1 µl (250 nM) Lu AF60097 (squares) or saline (circle) in ventral hippocampus of freely moving rats. The 5-HT levels show a continuous increase at all time points after the 40 min post injection bin to a maximum of 602 ± 156% of basal level (data are means ± S.E.M., n = 6). b Hippocampal perfusion of Lu AF60097 and imipramine synergistically increases extracellular 5-HT levels. Extracellular 5-HT levels were determined 40 min prior and 160 min after initiating (dotted line) a continuous perfusion of either saline (aCSF, circles), 1.9 µM Lu AF60097 (closed squares), 0.36 µM imipramine (open squares), 1.9 µM Lu AF60097 + 0.36 µM imipramine (triangles) in ventral hippocampus of freely moving rats. Inset: Area under the curve during perfusion (20–160 min) for the four conditions (matching colors to curves in main figure). The released 5-HT when perfused with both imipramine and Lu AF60097 is significantly increased (green bar). When perfused with either of the compounds alone (blue bars), the 5-HT levels are not different form saline (black bar). Data are means ± SEM (error bars), n = 9–15. The extracellular concentrations of 5-HT in both (a) and (b) are assessed by microdialysis and expressed as the percentage of the basal levels in the three fractions collected prior to perfusion start (dotted line). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. saline; ¤P < 0.05, ¤¤P < 0.01, ¤¤¤P < 0.001 vs. Lu AF60097; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.01 vs. imipramine; Bonferroni post-hoc test after significant RM two-way ANOVA or one-way ANOVA. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Roth BL. Multiple serotonin receptors: clinical and experimental aspects. Ann. Clin. Psychiatry. 1994;6:67–78. doi: 10.3109/10401239409148985. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kristensen AS, et al. SLC6 neurotransmitter transporters: structure, function, and regulation. Pharmacol. Rev. 2011;63:585–640. doi: 10.1124/pr.108.000869. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saier MH, Jr., Tran CV, Barabote RD. TCDB: the transporter classification database for membrane transport protein analyses and information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D181–D186. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gether U, Andersen PH, Larsson OM, Schousboe A. Neurotransmitter transporters: molecular function of important drug targets. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2006;27:375–383. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2006.05.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krishnan V, Nestler EJ. The molecular neurobiology of depression. Nature. 2008;455:894–902. doi: 10.1038/nature07455. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms