Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1047-1053.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30553-5. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

Health security capacities in the context of COVID-19 outbreak: an analysis of International Health Regulations annual report data from 182 countries

Affiliations

Health security capacities in the context of COVID-19 outbreak: an analysis of International Health Regulations annual report data from 182 countries

Nirmal Kandel et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: Public health measures to prevent, detect, and respond to events are essential to control public health risks, including infectious disease outbreaks, as highlighted in the International Health Regulations (IHR). In light of the outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), we aimed to review existing health security capacities against public health risks and events.

Methods: We used 18 indicators from the IHR State Party Annual Reporting (SPAR) tool and associated data from national SPAR reports to develop five indices: (1) prevent, (2) detect, (3) respond, (4) enabling function, and (5) operational readiness. We used SPAR 2018 data for all of the indicators and categorised countries into five levels across the indices, in which level 1 indicated the lowest level of national capacity and level 5 the highest. We also analysed data at the regional level (using the six geographical WHO regions).

Findings: Of 182 countries, 52 (28%) had prevent capacities at levels 1 or 2, and 60 (33%) had response capacities at levels 1 or 2. 81 (45%) countries had prevent capacities and 78 (43%) had response capacities at levels 4 or 5, indicating that these countries were operationally ready. 138 (76%) countries scored more highly in the detect index than in the other indices. 44 (24%) countries did not have an effective enabling function for public health risks and events, including infectious disease outbreaks (7 [4%] at level 1 and 37 [20%] at level 2). 102 (56%) countries had level 4 or level 5 enabling function capacities in place. 32 (18%) countries had low readiness (2 [1%] at level 1 and 30 [17%] at level 2), and 104 (57%) countries were operationally ready to prevent, detect, and control an outbreak of a novel infectious disease (66 [36%] at level 4 and 38 [21%] at level 5).

Interpretation: Countries vary widely in terms of their capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to outbreaks. Half of all countries analysed have strong operational readiness capacities in place, which suggests that an effective response to potential health emergencies could be enabled, including to COVID-19. Findings from local risk assessments are needed to fully understand national readiness capacities in relation to COVID-19. Capacity building and collaboration between countries are needed to strengthen global readiness for outbreak control.

Funding: None.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of countries according to capacities to prevent, detect, respond, enabling function, and operational readiness Level 1 represents the lowest capacity and level 5 the highest.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Operational readiness index by WHO regions Level 1 represents the lowest capacity and level 5 the highest. WPR=Western Pacific region. SEAR=South-East Asia region. EUR=European region. EMR=Eastern Mediterranean region. AMR=Region of the Americas. AFR=African region.

Comment in

  • Will COVID-19 generate global preparedness?
    Jacobsen KH. Jacobsen KH. Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1013-1014. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30559-6. Epub 2020 Mar 18. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32199074 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Offline: COVID-19-a reckoning.
    Horton R. Horton R. Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):935. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30669-3. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32199478 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Richman DD, Whitley RJ, Hayden FG. Clinical virology. 4th edn. ASM Press; Washington: 2016.
    1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO . Novel coronavirus (2019-NCoV) situation report 1. World Health Organisation; Geneva: Jan 11, 2020. www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200121-...
    1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727–733. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO Novel coronavirus (2019-NCoV) situation report 36. Geneva: World Health Organization. Feb 25, 2020. www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200225-...

Uncited Reference

    1. Gesesew HA, Tebeje B, Alemseged F, Beyene W. Health workforce acquisition, retention and turnover in southwest Ethiopian health institutions. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2016;26:331–340. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO World Bank and WHO: half of the world lack access to essential health services, 100 million still pushed intro extreme poverty because of health expenses. Tokyo: World Health Organization, Dec 13, 2017. www.who.int/news-room/detail/13-12-2017-world-bank-and-who-half-the-worl...

MeSH terms