Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;8(4):e524-e535.
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30062-0.

Prediction of dementia risk in low-income and middle-income countries (the 10/66 Study): an independent external validation of existing models

Affiliations

Prediction of dementia risk in low-income and middle-income countries (the 10/66 Study): an independent external validation of existing models

Blossom C M Stephan et al. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Background: To date, dementia prediction models have been exclusively developed and tested in high-income countries (HICs). However, most people with dementia live in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), where dementia risk prediction research is almost non-existent and the ability of current models to predict dementia is unknown. This study investigated whether dementia prediction models developed in HICs are applicable to LMICs.

Methods: Data were from the 10/66 Study. Individuals aged 65 years or older and without dementia at baseline were selected from China, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, Peru, Puerto Rico, and Venezuela. Dementia incidence was assessed over 3-5 years, with diagnosis according to the 10/66 Study diagnostic algorithm. Discrimination and calibration were tested for five models: the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia risk score (CAIDE); the Study on Aging, Cognition and Dementia (AgeCoDe) model; the Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI); the Brief Dementia Screening Indicator (BDSI); and the Rotterdam Study Basic Dementia Risk Model (BDRM). Models were tested with use of Cox regression. The discriminative accuracy of each model was assessed using Harrell's concordance (c)-statistic, with a value of 0·70 or higher considered to indicate acceptable discriminative ability. Calibration (model fit) was assessed statistically using the Grønnesby and Borgan test.

Findings: 11 143 individuals without baseline dementia and with available follow-up data were included in the analysis. During follow-up (mean 3·8 years [SD 1·3]), 1069 people progressed to dementia across all sites (incidence rate 24·9 cases per 1000 person-years). Performance of the models varied. Across countries, the discriminative ability of the CAIDE (0·52≤c≤0·63) and AgeCoDe (0·57≤c≤0·74) models was poor. By contrast, the ANU-ADRI (0·66≤c≤0·78), BDSI (0·62≤c≤0·78), and BDRM (0·66≤c≤0·78) models showed similar levels of discriminative ability to those of the development cohorts. All models showed good calibration, especially at low and intermediate levels of predicted risk. The models validated best in Peru and poorest in the Dominican Republic and China.

Interpretation: Not all dementia prediction models developed in HICs can be simply extrapolated to LMICs. Further work defining what number and which combination of risk variables works best for predicting risk of dementia in LMICs is needed. However, models that transport well could be used immediately for dementia prevention research and targeted risk reduction in LMICs.

Funding: National Institute for Health Research, Wellcome Trust, WHO, US Alzheimer's Association, and European Research Council.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of the predictive accuracy of each model when mapped in the 10/66 Study compared with the development cohort(s) c-statistics for the original studies are shown in green. The dashed line indicates the cutoff value for acceptable predictive accuracy (c-statistic ≥0·70). AgeCoDe=Study on Aging, Cognition and Dementia. ANU-ADRI=Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index. BDRM=Rotterdam Study Basic Dementia Risk Model. BDSI=Brief Dementia Screening Indicator. CAIDE=Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia risk score. CHS=Cardiovascular Health Study. CVHS=Cardiovascular Health Cognition Study. c=concordance. EPOZ=Epidemiological Prevention Study of Zoetermeer. FHS=Framingham Heart Study. HRS=Health and Retirement Survey. KP=Kungsholmen Project. MAP=Rush Memory and Aging Project. SALSA=The Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Discrimination accuracy of models by study site The three models with the highest accuracy at each site, and their respective c-statistics, are shown. AgeCoDe=Study on Aging, Cognition and Dementia. ANU-ADRI=Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index. BDRM=Rotterdam Study Basic Dementia Risk Model. BDSI=Brief Dementia Screening Indicator. c=concordance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predictive accuracies of each model according to random-effects meta-analyses AgeCoDe=Study on Aging, Cognition and Dementia. ANU-ADRI=Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index. BDRM=Rotterdam Study Basic Dementia Risk Model. BDSI=Brief Dementia Screening Indicator. CAIDE=Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Dementia risk score. c=concordance.

Comment in

References

    1. WHO . Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017–2025. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2017. https://www.who.int/mental_health/neurology/dementia/action_plan_2017_20...
    1. WHO . Risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2019. https://www.who.int/mental_health/neurology/dementia/guidelines_risk_red... - PubMed
    1. Stephan BCM, Kurth T, Matthews FE, Brayne C, Dufouil C. Dementia risk prediction in the population: are screening models accurate? Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:318–326. - PubMed
    1. Tang EY, Harrison SL, Errington L. Current developments in dementia risk prediction modelling: an updated systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136181. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hing Tang EY, Robinson L, Maree Stephan BC. Dementia risk assessment tools: an update. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2017;7:345–347. - PubMed

Publication types