Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices before approval
- PMID: 32199486
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33178-2
Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices before approval
Erratum in
-
Department of Error.Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1972. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30892-8. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32593335 No abstract available.
Abstract
Fewer than half of new drugs have data on their comparative benefits and harms against existing treatment options at the time of regulatory approval in Europe and the USA. Even when active-comparator trials exist, they might not produce meaningful data to inform decisions in clinical practice and health policy. The uncertainty associated with the paucity of well designed active-comparator trials has been compounded by legal and regulatory changes in Europe and the USA that have created a complex mix of expedited programmes aimed at facilitating faster access to new drugs. Comparative evidence generation is even sparser for medical devices. Some have argued that the current process for regulatory approval needs to generate more evidence that is useful for patients, clinicians, and payers in health-care systems. We propose a set of five key principles relevant to the European Medicines Agency, European medical device regulatory agencies, US Food and Drug Administration, as well as payers, that we believe will provide the necessary incentives for pharmaceutical and device companies to generate comparative data on drugs and devices and assure timely availability of evidence that is useful for decision making. First, labelling should routinely inform patients and clinicians whether comparative data exist on new products. Second, regulators should be more selective in their use of programmes that facilitate drug and device approvals on the basis of incomplete benefit and harm data. Third, regulators should encourage the conduct of randomised trials with active comparators. Fourth, regulators should use prospectively designed network meta-analyses based on existing and future randomised trials. Last, payers should use their policy levers and negotiating power to incentivise the generation of comparative evidence on new and existing drugs and devices, for example, by explicitly considering proven added benefit in pricing and payment decisions.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Ethical implications of poor comparative effectiveness evidence: obligations in industry-research partnerships.Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):926-928. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30413-X. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32199476 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1219-1256. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12476. Epub 2020 Oct 6. Milbank Q. 2020. PMID: 33021339 Free PMC article.
-
Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices after approval.Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):998-1010. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33177-0. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32199487 Review.
-
Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy.Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Aug;25(6):979-997. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01639-x. Epub 2023 Nov 14. Eur J Health Econ. 2024. PMID: 37962724 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Improving medical device regulation: the United States and Europe in perspective.Milbank Q. 2014 Mar;92(1):114-50. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12043. Milbank Q. 2014. PMID: 24597558 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1219-1256. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12476. Epub 2020 Oct 6. Milbank Q. 2020. PMID: 33021339 Free PMC article.
-
Ketamine and other glutamate receptor modulators for depression in adults with unipolar major depressive disorder.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 12;9(9):CD011612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011612.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34510411 Free PMC article.
-
[Allocation of single-use drugs in children in global compassionate use programs].Ethik Med. 2022;34(4):497-514. doi: 10.1007/s00481-022-00722-w. Epub 2022 Sep 30. Ethik Med. 2022. PMID: 36213336 Free PMC article. German.
-
Real-world Use of and Spending on New Oral Targeted Cancer Drugs in the US, 2011-2018.JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Dec 1;181(12):1596-1604. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.5983. JAMA Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 34661604 Free PMC article.
-
Anesthetic efficacy in vital asymptomatic teeth using different local anesthetics: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Jul 21;46(3):e41. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e41. eCollection 2021 Aug. Restor Dent Endod. 2021. PMID: 34513647 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical