Falling between two systems of care: Engaging families, behavioral health and the justice systems to increase uptake of substance use treatment in youth on probation
- PMID: 32199546
- PMCID: PMC7187516
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.01.008
Falling between two systems of care: Engaging families, behavioral health and the justice systems to increase uptake of substance use treatment in youth on probation
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "Falling between two systems of care: Engaging families, behavioral health and the justice systems to increase uptake of substance use treatment in youth on probation" [J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 112(2020) 49-59].J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Jul;114:108010. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108010. Epub 2020 May 7. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020. PMID: 32527507 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Justice-involved youth (JIY) in the US have high rates of substance use (SU) problems, yet 50%-80% of these youth do not receive necessary services. There has been no systematic exploration of the use of treatment services for JIY that examines viewpoints across stakeholders in justice- and treatment-systems as well as the families. We conducted qualitative interviews and focus groups with n = 58, youth, their caregivers, SU treatment providers and probation officers in a Northeastern state. Interviews explored how families, staff- and system-level factors influence uptake of and retention in SU treatment services in youth on probation. We conducted a thematic analysis of all interview texts. Caregiver engagement is essential for youth treatment uptake and retention. Difficulties achieving caregiver engagement and agreement that treatment was necessary stemmed from distrust in the "system"; denial or minimization of youth's SU problem; relational barriers; and overburden and chaos within the family system. Structural barriers to service uptake were lack of available treatment options, SU agency practices and policies, and interagency collaboration between SU treatment agencies and probation. Enhancing family engagement at the point of referral to SU treatment is essential. Improvements in interagency collaboration and communication between SU treatment and probation agencies are necessary. Implications for policy and intervention are discussed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Juvenile justice; Service use; Substance use.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Juvenile probation staff perceptions of engaging families in substance use services.Fam Relat. 2024 Jul;73(3):2079-2102. doi: 10.1111/fare.12974. Epub 2023 Dec 5. Fam Relat. 2024. PMID: 38881821 Free PMC article.
-
Text Messaging to Enhance Behavioral Health Treatment Engagement Among Justice-Involved Youth: Qualitative and User Testing Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 5;7(4):e10904. doi: 10.2196/10904. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 30950808 Free PMC article.
-
The Juvenile Justice Behavioral Health Services Cascade: A new framework for measuring unmet substance use treatment services needs among adolescent offenders.J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Mar;74:80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.12.012. Epub 2016 Dec 31. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017. PMID: 28132705 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of Substance Use Services to Justice-Involved Youth: Examining Barriers, Facilitators, and Best Practices.J Correct Health Care. 2023 Oct;29(5):347-354. doi: 10.1089/jchc.22.05.0040. Epub 2023 Sep 11. J Correct Health Care. 2023. PMID: 37695816 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bringing hope and change: a study of youth probation officers in Toronto.Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013 Sep;57(9):1158-82. doi: 10.1177/0306624X12445986. Epub 2012 May 9. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013. PMID: 22573709 Review.
Cited by
-
"Just as expensive as sending him to college:" barriers and perceptions of treatment in justice-involved youth.Health Justice. 2024 Jul 23;12(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40352-024-00289-2. Health Justice. 2024. PMID: 39042254 Free PMC article.
-
JUVENILE PROBATION OFFICER PERCEPTIONS OF PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT IN JUVENILE PROBATION AND WITH CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT.Crim Justice Behav. 2023 Jan;50(1):40-55. doi: 10.1177/00938548221106468. Epub 2022 Jun 29. Crim Justice Behav. 2023. PMID: 37006381 Free PMC article.
-
Breaking the cycle: connecting youth under community supervision to effective behavioral health services.Health Justice. 2025 Jul 3;13(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40352-025-00342-8. Health Justice. 2025. PMID: 40603732 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perceiving fairness in an unfair world: System justification and the mental health of girls in detention facilities.Am J Community Psychol. 2022 Jun;69(3-4):451-462. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12558. Epub 2021 Oct 25. Am J Community Psychol. 2022. PMID: 34694007 Free PMC article.
-
Opioid Use Disorder Stigma, Discrimination, and Policy Attitudes in a National Sample of U.S. Young Adults.J Adolesc Health. 2021 Aug;69(2):321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.12.142. Epub 2021 Feb 10. J Adolesc Health. 2021. PMID: 33579622 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wasserman GA, McReynolds LS, Lucas CP, Fisher P, Santos L. The voice DISC-IV with incarcerated male youths: Prevalance of disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2002;41(3):314–21. - PubMed
-
- Domalanta DD, Risser WL, Roberts RE, Risser JM. Prevalence of depression and other psychiatric disorders among incarcerated youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2003;424(4):477–88. - PubMed