Falling between two systems of care: Engaging families, behavioral health and the justice systems to increase uptake of substance use treatment in youth on probation
- PMID: 32199546
- PMCID: PMC7187516
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.01.008
Falling between two systems of care: Engaging families, behavioral health and the justice systems to increase uptake of substance use treatment in youth on probation
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "Falling between two systems of care: Engaging families, behavioral health and the justice systems to increase uptake of substance use treatment in youth on probation" [J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 112(2020) 49-59].J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Jul;114:108010. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108010. Epub 2020 May 7. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020. PMID: 32527507 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Justice-involved youth (JIY) in the US have high rates of substance use (SU) problems, yet 50%-80% of these youth do not receive necessary services. There has been no systematic exploration of the use of treatment services for JIY that examines viewpoints across stakeholders in justice- and treatment-systems as well as the families. We conducted qualitative interviews and focus groups with n = 58, youth, their caregivers, SU treatment providers and probation officers in a Northeastern state. Interviews explored how families, staff- and system-level factors influence uptake of and retention in SU treatment services in youth on probation. We conducted a thematic analysis of all interview texts. Caregiver engagement is essential for youth treatment uptake and retention. Difficulties achieving caregiver engagement and agreement that treatment was necessary stemmed from distrust in the "system"; denial or minimization of youth's SU problem; relational barriers; and overburden and chaos within the family system. Structural barriers to service uptake were lack of available treatment options, SU agency practices and policies, and interagency collaboration between SU treatment agencies and probation. Enhancing family engagement at the point of referral to SU treatment is essential. Improvements in interagency collaboration and communication between SU treatment and probation agencies are necessary. Implications for policy and intervention are discussed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Juvenile justice; Service use; Substance use.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Wasserman GA, McReynolds LS, Lucas CP, Fisher P, Santos L. The voice DISC-IV with incarcerated male youths: Prevalance of disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2002;41(3):314–21. - PubMed
-
- Domalanta DD, Risser WL, Roberts RE, Risser JM. Prevalence of depression and other psychiatric disorders among incarcerated youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2003;424(4):477–88. - PubMed
