Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;4(4):575-591.
doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00204-z.

Cost-Effectiveness Analyses, Costs and Resource Use, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Follicular or Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Systematic Reviews

Affiliations
Review

Cost-Effectiveness Analyses, Costs and Resource Use, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Follicular or Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Systematic Reviews

Neerav Monga et al. Pharmacoecon Open. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are types of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that develop in the B lymphocytes (also known as B cells).

Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive review of studies relating to cost effectiveness, costs and resource use, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with FL or MZL.

Methods: Three separate systematic reviews were conducted to identify all published evidence on cost effectiveness, costs and resource use, and HRQoL between 2007 and March 2017 using the MEDLINE®, MEDLINE in-process, E-pubs ahead of print (Ovid SP®), Embase (Ovid SP®), NHS EED, and EconLit databases. Select congress proceedings were also searched. Two systematic reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and full papers against eligibility criteria. Relevant data were extracted into bespoke data extraction templates (DETs) by a single systematic reviewer; these data were then validated for accuracy by a second reviewer against clean copies of the relevant publications.

Results: A total of 25 cost-effectiveness studies (24 in FL; 1 in FL and MZL) met the eligibility criteria. Markov models were the most utilised cost-effectiveness model. US FL studies reported an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $28,565/QALY for first-line rituximab-cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CVP) versus CVP, and $43,000/QALY for second-line obinutuzumab plus bendamustine (G + B) followed by G maintenance versus B. In the UK, ICERs were £1529-10,834/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for first-line rituximab + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, £27,988/QALY for second-line G + B + G-maintenance versus B, and £62,653/QALY for second-line idelalisib versus chemotherapy and/or rituximab. Five costs/resource use and four HRQoL studies were identified in FL, and none in MZL. US mean lifetime costs in first-line patients ranged from $108,000 (rituximab) to $130,300 (rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine and prednisolone [CHOP]), and from £2185 (watch-and-wait) to £17,054 (chemotherapy) in the UK. In a multinational study, more rituximab-refractory patients receiving G + B + G-maintenance reported a meaningful improvement in total FACT-Lym scores compared with patients receiving B. In the UK, total FACT-Lym scores were meaningfully higher for newly diagnosed patients compared with patients with progression (136.04 vs. 109.7).

Conclusions and relevance: We found a small body of evidence of quality of life, and potentially cost-effective treatment options for FL; however, no evidence was reported on MZL specifically. The significant data gaps in knowledge in these diseases demonstrate a marked need for further studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Neerav Monga, Jamie Garside, Christina Loefgren, and Christoph Tapprich are employees of Janssen. Loretta Nastoupil and Catherine Thieblement received research support/honoraria from Janssen. Peter O’Donovan, Binu Gurung and Joan Quigley are employees of ICON plc and have received funding from Janssen to conduct/support this research.

References

    1. BMJ Best Practice. Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: classification 2016. Available at: http://bestpractice.bmj.com/best-practice/monograph/312/basics/classific.... Accessed 18 Oct 2016.
    1. Chao MP. Treatment challenges in the management of relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma—novel and emerging therapies. Cancer Manag Res. 2013;5:251–269. doi: 10.2147/cmar.s34273. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration.
    1. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–784. doi: 10.7326/m14-2385. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare. 2009. https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf.