Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 16;6(1):00221-2019.
doi: 10.1183/23120541.00221-2019. eCollection 2020 Jan.

Improving lung cancer diagnosis by combining exhaled-breath data and clinical parameters

Affiliations

Improving lung cancer diagnosis by combining exhaled-breath data and clinical parameters

Sharina Kort et al. ERJ Open Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: Exhaled-breath analysis of volatile organic compounds could detect lung cancer earlier, possibly leading to improved outcomes. Combining exhaled-breath data with clinical parameters may improve lung cancer diagnosis.

Methods: Based on data from a previous multi-centre study, this article reports additional analyses. 138 subjects with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 143 controls without NSCLC breathed into the Aeonose. The diagnostic accuracy, presented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), of the Aeonose itself was compared with 1) performing a multivariate logistic regression analysis of the distinct clinical parameters obtained, and 2) using this clinical information beforehand in the training process of the artificial neural network (ANN) for the breath analysis.

Results: NSCLC patients (mean±sd age 67.1±9.1 years, 58% male) were compared with controls (62.1±7.0 years, 40.6% male). The AUC-ROC of the classification value of the Aeonose itself was 0.75 (95% CI 0.69-0.81). Adding age, number of pack-years and presence of COPD to this value in a multivariate regression analysis resulted in an improved performance with an AUC-ROC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.90). Adding these clinical variables beforehand to the ANN for classifying the breath print also led to an improved performance with an AUC-ROC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.79-0.89).

Conclusions: Adding readily available clinical information to the classification value of exhaled-breath analysis with the Aeonose, either post hoc in a multivariate regression analysis or a priori to the ANN, significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy to detect the presence or absence of lung cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: S. Kort reports an unrestricted research grant paid to her institution by The eNose Company, Zutphen, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: M. Brusse-Keizer has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.W. Gerritsen is an employee of The eNose Company, Zutphen. Conflict of interest: J.H. Schouwink has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Citgez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F.H.C. de Jongh has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. van der Maten has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Samii has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. van den Bogart has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. van der Palen has nothing to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart showing the different groups. NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Combined receiver operating characteristic curve showing four predictive algorithms: logistic regression clinical variables, single Aeonose value, extended artificial neural network (ANN) and logistic regression including Aeonose value.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394–424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. . The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11: 39–51. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 7–30. doi:10.3322/caac.21442 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. . Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 395–409. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1102873 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patz EF Jr, Greco E, Gatsonis C, et al. . Lung cancer incidence and mortality in National Lung Screening Trial participants who underwent low-dose CT prevalence screening: a retrospective cohort analysis of a randomised, multicentre, diagnostic screening trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: 590–599. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00621-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources