Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 15;4(1):e000619.
doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000619. eCollection 2020.

Nationwide, population-based study of school grades in practical and aesthetic subjects of children treated for brain tumour

Affiliations

Nationwide, population-based study of school grades in practical and aesthetic subjects of children treated for brain tumour

Malin Lönnerblad et al. BMJ Paediatr Open. .

Abstract

Background: Children treated for brain tumour (hereafter termed paediatric brain tumour survivors (PBTS)) often need extra support in school because of late-appearing side effects after their treatment. We explored how this group of children perform in the five practical and aesthetic (PRAEST) subjects: home and consumer studies, physical education and health, art, crafts and music.

Methods: In this nationwide population-based study of data from the Swedish Childhood Cancer Registry and Statistics Sweden, we included 475 children born between 1988 and 1996, diagnosed with a brain tumour before their 15th birthday. We compared their grades in PRAEST subjects with those of 2197 matched controls. We also investigated if there were any differences between girls and boys, children diagnosed at different ages, and children with high-grade or low-grade tumours.

Results: The odds for failing a subject were two to three times higher for girls treated for a brain tumour compared with their controls in all five PRAEST subjects, whereas there were no significant differences between the boys and their controls in any subject. PBTS had lower average grades from year 9 in all PRAEST subjects, and girls differed from their controls in all five subjects, while boys differed in physical education and health and music. PBTS treated for high-grade tumours neither did have significantly different average grades nor did they fail a subject to a significantly higher extent than PBTS treated for low-grade tumours.

Conclusions: Children treated for a brain tumour, especially girls, are at risk of lower average grades or failing PRAEST subjects. All children treated for brain tumour may need extra support as these subjects are important for their well-being and future skills.

Keywords: epidemiology; oncology; school health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Inclusion and exclusion criteria PBTS and controls. PBTS, paediatric brain tumour survivor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ORs and 95% CIs for failing a subject. The lower part of the figure includes only PBTS. PBTS, paediatric brain tumour survivor.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gustafsson G, Kogner P, Heyman M. Childhood Cancer Incidence and Survival in Sweden 1984-2010, 2013. Available: http://www.forskasverige.se/wp-content/uploads/ChildhoodCancerIncidencea...
    1. Robinson KE, Kuttesch JF, Champion JE, et al. . A quantitative meta-analysis of neurocognitive sequelae in survivors of pediatric brain tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2010;55:525–31. 10.1002/pbc.22568 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mulhern RK, Merchant TE, Gajjar A, et al. . Late neurocognitive sequelae in survivors of brain tumours in childhood. Lancet Oncol 2004;5:399–408. 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01507-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bitsko MJ, Cohen D, Dillon R, et al. . Psychosocial late effects in pediatric cancer survivors: a report from the children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2016;63:337–43. 10.1002/pbc.25773 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen KK, Duun-Henriksen AK, Frederiksen MH, et al. . Ninth grade school performance in Danish childhood cancer survivors. Br J Cancer 2017;116:398–404. 10.1038/bjc.2016.438 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources