Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 May;34(5):677-687.
doi: 10.1177/0269215520912515. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

Six-month reviews for stroke survivors: a study of the modified Greater Manchester Stroke Assessment Tool with care home residents

Emma Patchwood  1 , Kate Woodward-Nutt  2 , Katy Rothwell  3 , Catherine Perry  4 , Pippa Tyrrell  5 , Audrey Bowen  1
Affiliations
Observational Study

Six-month reviews for stroke survivors: a study of the modified Greater Manchester Stroke Assessment Tool with care home residents

Emma Patchwood et al. Clin Rehabil. 2020 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the feasibility of using a stroke-specific toolkit for six-month post-stroke reviews in care homes to identify unmet needs and actions.

Design: An observational study including qualitative interviews to explore the process and outcome of reviews.

Setting: UK care homes.

Participants: Stroke survivors, family members, care home staff (review participants) and external staff involved in conducting reviews (assessors).

Interventions: Modified Greater Manchester Stroke Assessment Tool (GM-SAT).

Results: The observational study provided data on 74 stroke survivors across 51 care homes. In total, out of 74, 45 (61%) had unmet needs identified. Common unmet needs related to blood pressure, mobility, medicine management and mood. We conducted 25 qualitative interviews, including 13 review participants and 12 assessors. Three overarching qualitative themes covered acceptability of conducting reviews in care homes, process and outcomes of reviews, and acceptability of modified GM-SAT review toolkit. The modified GM-SAT review was positively valued, but stroke survivors had poor recall of the review event including the actions agreed. Care home staff sometimes assisted with reviews and highlighted their need for training to support day-to-day needs of stroke survivors. Assessors highlighted a need for clearer guidance on the use of the toolkit and suggested further modifications to enhance it. They also identified organizational barriers and facilitators to implementing reviews and communicating planned actions to GPs and other agencies.

Conclusion: The modified GM-SAT provides a feasible means of conducting six-month reviews for stroke survivors in care homes and helps identify important needs. Further modifications have enhanced acceptability. Full implementation into practice requires staff training and organizational changes.

Keywords: Stroke; care home; post-stroke reviews; unmet needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Qualitative themes, using study aims as the framework.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke, 2016, https://www.strokeaudit.org/SupportFiles/Documents/Guidelines/2016-Natio...
    1. Royal College of Physicians. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP): clinical audit August-November 2016. public report, 2017, https://www.strokeaudit.org/Documents/National/Clinical/AugNov2016/AugNo...
    1. Rothwell K, Boaden R, Bamford D, et al. Feasibility of assessing the needs of stroke patients after six months using the GM-SAT. Clin Rehabil 2013; 27(3): 264–271. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kersten P, McLellan L, George S, et al. The Southampton Needs Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ): a valid tool for assessing the rehabilitation needs of disabled people. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14(6): 641–650. - PubMed
    1. Philp I, Brainin M, Walker MF, et al. Development of a poststroke checklist to standardize follow-up care for stroke survivors. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22(7): e173–e180. - PubMed

Publication types