Similar articles

• Comparison of complications rates between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion and systematic TRUS prostatic biopsies.

  Queiroz MRG, Falsarella PM, Mariotti GC, Lemos GC, Baroni RH, Mussi TC, Garcia RG. Queiroz MRG, et al. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Feb;44(2):732-738. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1782-y. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019. PMID: 30255444
• Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

  Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Drost FH, van Leenders GJ, Bokhorst LP, Bangma CH, Schoots IG. Alberts AR, et al. BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):511-519. doi: 10.1111/bju.13836. Epub 2017 Apr 4. BJU Int. 2017. PMID: 28267899
• Multiattribute probabilistic prostate elastic registration (MAPPER): application to fusion of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.

  Sparks R, Bloch BN, Feleppa E, Barratt D, Moses D, Ponsky L, Madabhushi A. Sparks R, et al. Med Phys. 2015 Mar;42(3):1153-63. doi: 10.1118/1.4905104. Med Phys. 2015. PMID: 25735270 Free PMC article.
• Elastic Versus Rigid Image Registration in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

  Venderink W, de Rooij M, Sedelaar JPM, Huisman HJ, Fütterer JJ. Venderink W, et al. Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Mar;4(2):219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 29. Eur Urol Focus. 2018. PMID: 28753777
• Beyond transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: available techniques and approaches.

  Warlick C, Futterer J, Maruf M, George AK, Rastinehad AR, Pinto PA, Bosaily AE, Villers A, Moore CM, Mendhiratta N, Taneja SS, Ukimura O, Konety BR. Warlick C, et al. World J Urol. 2019 Mar;37(3):419-427. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2374-8. Epub 2018 Jun 25. World J Urol. 2019. PMID: 29943220 Review.