Broadening the therapeutic horizon of advanced biliary tract cancer through molecular characterisation
- PMID: 32203843
- PMCID: PMC8222858
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.101998
Broadening the therapeutic horizon of advanced biliary tract cancer through molecular characterisation
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTC) comprise a group of rare and heterogeneous poor-prognosis tumours with the incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma increasing over recent years. Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is the established first-line treatment for advanced BTC with a significant but modest survival advantage over monotherapy. There remains no accepted standard treatment in the second-line setting, although recent results from a randomised study have shown a survival benefit with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin chemotherapy. Historically, clinical trials investigating targeted therapies in unselected BTC have failed to demonstrate significant clinical benefit. More recently, advancement in molecular exploration of BTC has shed light on the complex biological heterogeneity within these tumours and has also identified actionable genomic aberrations, such as fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) gene fusions, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and BRAF mutations, which offer promise with the anticipation of increased responses and durable clinical benefit in selected patients. Several targeted drugs have now entered clinical development with some encouraging results being seen. Here we review the current and rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape of advanced BTC, including targeted therapies and immunotherapy. We also discuss how recent efforts and successes in BTC are overcoming the obstacles typically associated with precision medicine in rare cancers. Ultimately, the management of advanced BTC is likely to become molecularly selected in the near future with the hope of finally improving the bleak prognosis of patients with this disease.
Keywords: Biliary cancer; Cholangiocarcinoma; Molecular classification; Targeted therapies.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest A. Athauda: none C. Fong: none DK Lau: none M. Javle: Bayer; BeiGene; Incyte; Merck; Merck Serono; Novartis; Pieris Pharmaceuticals; QED Therapeutics; Rafael Pharmaceuticals; Seattle Genetics G. Abou-Alfa: Research: ActaBiologica, Agios, Array, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Beigene, BMS, Casi, Celgene, Exelixis, Genentech, Halozyme, Incyte, Lilly, Mabvax, Novartis, Polaris Puma, QED, Roche. Consulting: Agios, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Bioline, BMS, Celgene, CytomX, Debio, Eisai, Exelixis, Flatiron, Genoscience, Incyte, Ipsen, Jansen, LAM, Lilly, Loxo, Merck, MINA, Pfizer, QED, Redhill, Sanofi, Silenseed, Sillajen, Sobi, Targovax, Twoxar, Vicus, Yiviva. K. Steward: Full time employee of QED Therapeutics Inc. I. Chau: Advisory Board: Eli-Lilly, Bristol Meyers Squibb, MSD, Bayer, Roche, Merck-Serono, Five Prime Therapeutics, Astra-Zeneca, Oncologie International, Pierre Fabre. Research funding: Eli-Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi Oncology, Merck-Serono. Honorarium: Eli-Lilly.
Figures
References
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
