Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals
- PMID: 32204321
- PMCID: PMC7141183
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030832
Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals
Abstract
The use of patient-specific implants (PSIs) in craniofacial surgery is often limited due to a lack of expertise and/or production costs. Therefore, a simple and cost-efficient template-based fabrication workflow has been developed to overcome these disadvantages. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of PSIs made from their original templates. For a representative cranial defect (CRD) and a temporo-orbital defect (TOD), ten PSIs were made from polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) using computer-aided design (CAD) and three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. These customized implants were measured and compared with their original 3D printed templates. The implants for the CRD revealed a root mean square (RMS) value ranging from 1.128 to 0.469 mm with a median RMS (Q1 to Q3) of 0.574 (0.528 to 0.701) mm. Those for the TOD revealed an RMS value ranging from 1.079 to 0.630 mm with a median RMS (Q1 to Q3) of 0.843 (0.635 to 0.943) mm. This study demonstrates that a highly precise duplication of PSIs can be achieved using this template-molding workflow. Thus, virtually planned implants can be accurately transferred into haptic PSIs. This workflow appears to offer a sophisticated solution for craniofacial reconstruction and continues to prove itself in daily clinical practice.
Keywords: 3D printing; PMMA; accuracy; additive manufacturing; craniofacial reconstruction; cranioplasty; molding; patient-specific implant.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures







References
-
- Gilardino M.S., Karunanayake M., Al-Humsi T., Izadpanah A., Al-Ajmi H., Marcoux J., Atkinson J., Farmer J.P. A comparison and cost analysis of cranioplasty techniques: Autologous bone versus custom computer-generated implants. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2015;26:113–117. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001305. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous