Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;35(6):1127-1133.
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1743661. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

Extending epidural analgesia for intrapartum cesarean section following epidural labor analgesia: a retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

Extending epidural analgesia for intrapartum cesarean section following epidural labor analgesia: a retrospective cohort study

Chan Shen et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of extending epidural analgesia following epidural labor analgesia for intrapartum cesarean section, and provide a reference for clinical practice.

Methods: Data of 1254 singleton parturient who failed trial of epidural labor analgesia and underwent intrapartum cesarean section were retrospectively included. After entering the operating room, parturient were given 3 ml of 1.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine 15 µg as a test dose, followed by a dose of 10 ml 0.75% ropivacaine plus 5 ml of 2% lidocaine mixed solution was administered via the epidural catheter. Case data were reviewed and analyzed of cesarean section anesthesia implementation methods, results and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Results: Of the 1254 parturient, 4.7% (59 of 1254) underwent general anesthesia directly, 7.1% (89 of 1254) were given combined spinal and epidural anesthesia, and the other 88.2% (1106 of 1254) underwent extending epidural anesthesia, 3.5% (39 of 1106) of them were given general anesthesia after extending epidural anesthesia failed, and 96.5% (1067 of 1106) parturient have a successful extending epidural anesthesia. Adverse reactions of extending epidural anesthesia: 6.7% (72 of 1067) parturient experienced hypotension and 12.1% (129 of 1067) of nausea and vomiting occurred. For the neonatal Apgar scores at 1 min, eleven of 1254 (0.9%) newborns were between 0 and 3 points, 107 (8.5%) newborns between 4 and 7 points, and 1136 (90.6%) newborns Apgar scores between 8 and 10 point. 24 (1.9%) newborns with Apgar scores between 4 to 7 points at 5 min transferred to the department of neonatology, and the rest 1230 (98.1%) newborns with Apgar scores 8-10 points.

Conclusion: Extending epidural analgesia using the well-functioning epidural catheter for epidural labor analgesia might be a reliable and effective anesthetic method for intrapartum cesarean section.

Keywords: Epidural labor analgesia; extending epidural analgesia; intrapartum cesarean section; obstetric anesthesia; trial failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources