Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 23;10(3):e029624.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029624.

Spatiotemporal modelling of pregabalin prescribing in England with effect of deprivation

Affiliations

Spatiotemporal modelling of pregabalin prescribing in England with effect of deprivation

Ziyu Zheng et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: This paper aims to understand spatial and temporal trends in pregabalin prescribing and the relationship with deprivation across England at both general practice and clinical commissioning group (CCG) levels.

Design: A set of 207 independent generalised additive models are employed to model the spatiotemporal trend of pregabalin prescribed and dispensed per 1000 population, adjusting for deprivation. The response variable is pregabalin prescribed in milligrams, with weighted Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), geographical location and time as predictors. The set of active prescribing facilities grouped within CCG is the unit of analysis.

Setting: National Health Service open prescribing data; all general practices in England, UK between January 2015 and June 2017.

Population: All patients registered to general practices in England, UK.

Results: Adjusting for deprivation, a North-South divide is shown in terms of prescribing trends, with the North of England showing increasing prescribing rates during the study period on average, while in the South of England rates are on average decreasing. Approximately 60% of general practices showed increasing prescribing rate, with the highest being 4.03 (1.75 for the most decreasing). There were no apparent spatial patterns in baseline prescription rates at the CCG level. Weighted IMD score proved to be statistically significant in 138 of 207 CCGs. Two-thirds of CCGs showed more pregabalin prescribed in areas of greater deprivation. Whether the prescribing rate is high due to high baseline prescription rate or increasing rates needs to be specifically looked at.

Conclusions: The spatial temporal modelling demonstrated that the North of England has a significantly higher chance to see increase in pregablin prescriptions compared with the South, adjusted for weighted IMD. Weighted IMD has shown positive impact on pregabalin prescriptions for 138 CCGs.

Keywords: NHS prescribing data; epidemiology; pregabalin; primary care; spatio-temporal mapping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Probability of an increasing pregabalin prescription rate for each individual general practice surgery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average probability of increasing pregabalin prescription rates within each clinical commissioning group: England and Wales.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Average probability of increasing pregabalin prescription rates within each clinical commissioning group: London (zoned in).
Figure 4
Figure 4
IMD-adjusted baseline prescription rates in percentiles for each clinical commissioning group: England and Wales. IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
IMD-adjusted baseline prescription rates in percentiles for each clinical commissioning group: London (zoned in). IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Map of probability of the relationship between weighted IMD and pregabalin prescription rates being positive for each clinical commissioning group: England and Wales. IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Map of probability of the relationship between weighted IMD and pregabalin prescription rates being positive for each clinical commissioning group: London (zoned in). IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation.

Similar articles

References

    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Neuropathic pain in adults: pharmacological management in non-specialist settings, 2013. Available: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG173 [Accessed Jan 2018]. - PubMed
    1. Stannard C. Misuse of gabapentin and pregabalin: a marker for a more serious malaise? Addiction 2016;111:1699–700. 10.1111/add.13408 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shanthanna H, Gilron I, Rajarathinam M, et al. . Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med 2017;14:e1002369 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002369 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spence D. Bad medicine: gabapentin and pregabalin. BMJ 2013;347:f6747 10.1136/bmj.f6747 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schifano F. Misuse and abuse of pregabalin and gabapentin: cause for concern? CNS Drugs 2014;28:491–6. 10.1007/s40263-014-0164-4 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources