Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;24(3):317-329.
doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000532.

Clinicopathologic Diagnostic Criteria for Vulvar Lichen Planus

Tania Day, Edward Wilkinson  1 , Darion Rowan  2 , James Scurry; ISSVD Difficult Pathologic Diagnoses Committee*
Affiliations

Clinicopathologic Diagnostic Criteria for Vulvar Lichen Planus

Tania Day et al. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to describe the clinical and histopathologic features required for a clinicopathologic diagnosis of vulvar lichen planus (LP), which is divided into 3 types: erosive, classic, and hypertrophic.

Materials and methods: The International Society of the Study of Vulvovaginal Diseases tasked the Difficult Pathologic Diagnoses committee with development of a consensus document for the clinicopathologic diagnosis of vulvar LP, lichen sclerosus, and differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. The LP subgroup reviewed the literature and formulated diagnostic criteria, then approved by the International Society of the Study of Vulvovaginal Diseases membership.

Results: The clinicopathologic diagnosis of erosive LP incorporates 5 criteria: (a) a well-demarcated, glazed red macule or patch at labia minora, vestibule, and/or vagina, (b) disease affects hairless skin, mucocutaneous junction, and/or nonkeratinized squamous epithelium, (c) evidence of basal layer damage, categorized as degenerative or regenerative, (d) a closely applied band-like lymphocytic infiltrate, and (e) absent subepithelial sclerosis. The clinicopathologic diagnoses of classic and hypertrophic LP each require a characteristic clinical appearance accompanied by hyperkeratosis, hypergranulosis, acanthosis, basal layer degeneration, a closely applied lymphocytic infiltrate, and absent dermal sclerosis, with hypertrophic LP showing marked epithelial abnormality compared with classic LP.

Conclusions: Clinicopathological correlation yields the most reliable diagnosis of vulvar LP. Disease appearance overlaps with other physiologic, dermatologic, infectious, and neoplastic entities; a low threshold for biopsy at all morphologically distinct areas is recommended. Use of the histopathologic criteria described in this document may reduce the nondiagnostic biopsy rate for clinically diagnosed LP.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Terlou A, Santegoets LA, van der Meijden WI, et al. An autoimmune phenotype in vulvar lichen sclerosus and lichen planus: a Th1 response and high levels of microRNA-155. J Invest Dermatol 2012;132:658–66.
    1. Lewin MR, Hick RW, Selim MA. Lichenoid dermatitis of the vulva: diagnosis and differential diagnosis for the gynecologic pathologist. Adv Anat Pathol 2017;24:278–93.
    1. Wang W, Lazar A. Lichenoid and interface dermatitis, Chapter 7. In: Calonje E, Brenn T, Lazar A, et al, eds. McKee's Pathology of the Skin With Clinical Correlations. 4th ed. London: Elsevier; 2012:219–58.
    1. Patterson JW, Hosler GA. Tissue reaction patterns, Section 2, and the dermis and subcutis, Section 4. In: Patterson JW, ed. Weedon's Skin Pathology. 4th ed. vol. 37–80. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2016:362–4.
    1. LeCleach LL, Chosidow O. Lichen planus. NEJM 2012;366:723–32.

LinkOut - more resources