Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr;10(2):230-236.
doi: 10.1177/2192568219837145. Epub 2019 Mar 25.

Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion With Interfacet Cages: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Joseph L Laratta  1   2 , Karishma Gupta  3 , William D Smith  3
Affiliations
Review

Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion With Interfacet Cages: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Joseph L Laratta et al. Global Spine J. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Study design: Literature review.

Objectives: Posterior cervical interfacet cages are an alternative to lateral mass fixation in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Recently, a percutaneous, tissue-sparing system for interfacet cage placement has been developed, however, there is limited clinical evidence supporting its widespread use. The aim was to review studies published on this system for patient reported outcomes, radiographic outcomes, intraoperative outcomes, and complications.

Methods: Four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and MEDLINE) were queried for original published studies that evaluated the percutaneous, tissue-sparing technique for posterior cervical fusion with interfacet cage placement. All studies reporting on open techniques and purely biomechanical studies were excluded.

Results: The extensive literature search returned 7852 studies. After systematic review, a total of 7 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were independently classified as retrospective or prospective cohort studies and each assessed by the GRADE criteria. Patient reported outcomes, radiographic outcomes, intraoperative outcomes, and complications were extracted from each study and presented.

Conclusions: Tissue-sparing, posterior cervical fusion with interfacet cages may be considered a safe and effective surgical intervention in patients failing conservative management for cervical spondylotic disease. However, the quality of evidence in the literature is lacking, and controlled, comparative studies are needed for definitive assessment.

Keywords: Cavux; DTRAX; cervical spacer; facet spacer; implant; interfacet cage; posterior cervical fusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Dr Joseph Laratta reports personal fees for consultancy from Spineart, Evolution Spine, and Gerson Lehrman Group, royalties from Spineart and Evolution Spine, intellectual property with Combination Biologic and ICBG/BMAC system, grants from Medtronic, NuVasive, Orthopaedic Science Research Foundation, Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation, personal fees for travel expenses/meeting accommodations from American Institute of Minimally Invasive Surgery (AIMIS), NuVasive, Stryker, K2M, and Fisher Owen Fund, and is on the editorial board for Spine, Global Spine Journal, and Journal of Spine Surgery. Dr William Smith reports personal fee for consultancy from NuVasive, Spineology, Pediguard, Providence, and Ortho Bio Design, grants from MDT, NuVasive, Providence, and Spineology, ownership interest in NuVasive, Pediguard, and SpineSmith, royalty from NuVasive and Spineology, and is on the speakers’ bureau for NuVasive and Pediguard.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram presenting the systematic review process used in this study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Caridi JM, Pumberger M, Hughes AP. Cervical radiculopathy: a review. HSS J. 2011;7:265–272. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goel A, Shah A. Facetal distraction as treatment for single­ and multilevel cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy: a preliminary report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:689–696. - PubMed
    1. Tan LA, Straus DC, Taynelis VC. Cervical interfacet spacers and maintenance of cervical lordosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22:466–469. - PubMed
    1. Tan LA, Gerard CS, Anderson PA, Traynelis VC. Effect of machined interfacet allograft spacers on cervical foraminal height and area. J Neurosurge Spine. 2014;20:178–182. - PubMed
    1. Goel A. Facet distraction-arthrodesis technique: can it revolutionize spinal stabilization methods. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2011;2:1–2. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources