Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;20(4):62-70.
doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1730483.

The "Ought-Is" Problem: An Implementation Science Framework for Translating Ethical Norms Into Practice

Affiliations

The "Ought-Is" Problem: An Implementation Science Framework for Translating Ethical Norms Into Practice

Bryan A Sisk et al. Am J Bioeth. 2020 May.

Abstract

We argue that once a normative claim is developed, there is an imperative to effect changes based on this norm. As such, ethicists should adopt an "implementation mindset" when formulating norms, and collaborate with others who have the expertise needed to implement policies and practices. To guide this translation of norms into practice, we propose a framework that incorporates implementation science into ethics. Implementation science is a discipline dedicated to supporting the sustained enactment of interventions. We further argue that implementation principles should be integrated into the development of specific normative claims as well as the enactment of these norms. Ethicists formulating a specific norm should consider whether that norm can feasibly be enacted because the resultant specific norm will directly affect the types of interventions subsequently developed. To inform this argument, we will describe the fundamental principles of implementation science, using informed consent to research participation as an illustration.

Keywords: Ethics; applied ethics; empirical ethics; implementation science; normative ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Framework for Implementation of Ethical Norms Note – Circular arrows indicate sequential iterative processes.

Comment in

References

    1. Agre Patricia, Campbell Frances A., Goldman Barbara D., Kass Nancy E., Boccia Maria L., McCullough Laurence B., Merz Jon F., Miller Suzanne M., Mintz Jim, Rapkin Bruce, Sugarman Jeremy, Sorenson James, and Wirshing Donna. 2003. “Improving informed consent: The medium is not the message.” IRB: Ethics & Human Research Suppl 25 (5):S11–S19. - PubMed
    1. Aristotle. 1980. The Nicomachean ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    1. Balas EA, and Boren SA. 2000. “Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement.” Yearb Med Inform (1):65–70. - PubMed
    1. Brownson Ross C., Colditz Graham A., and Proctor Enola Knisley. 2012. Dissemination and implementation research in health : translating science to practice. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
    1. Burns Patricia B, Rohrich Rod J, and Chung Kevin C. 2011. “The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 128 (1):305–10. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types