Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;9(1):e000714.
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000714.

Development and application of 'systems thinking' principles for quality improvement

Affiliations

Development and application of 'systems thinking' principles for quality improvement

Duncan McNab et al. BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: 'Systems thinking' is often recommended in healthcare to support quality and safety activities but a shared understanding of this concept and purposeful guidance on its application are limited. Healthcare systems have been described as complex where human adaptation to localised circumstances is often necessary to achieve success. Principles for managing and improving system safety developed by the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL; a European intergovernmental air navigation organisation) incorporate a 'Safety-II systems approach' to promote understanding of how safety may be achieved in complex work systems. We aimed to adapt and contextualise the core principles of this systems approach and demonstrate the application in a healthcare setting.

Methods: The original EUROCONTROL principles were adapted using consensus-building methods with front-line staff and national safety leaders.

Results: Six interrelated principles for healthcare were agreed. The foundation concept acknowledges that 'most healthcare problems and solutions belong to the system'. Principle 1 outlines the need to seek multiple perspectives to understand system safety. Principle 2 prompts us to consider the influence of prevailing work conditions-demand, capacity, resources and constraints. Principle 3 stresses the importance of analysing interactions and work flow within the system. Principle 4 encourages us to attempt to understand why professional decisions made sense at the time and principle 5 prompts us to explore everyday work including the adjustments made to achieve success in changing system conditions.A case study is used to demonstrate the application in an analysis of a system and in the subsequent improvement intervention design.

Conclusions: Application of the adapted principles underpins, and is characteristic of, a holistic systems approach and may aid care team and organisational system understanding and improvement.

Keywords: complexity; human factors; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Systems Thinking for Everyday Work model.

References

    1. Leveson N, Dulac N, Marais K, et al. Moving beyond normal accidents and high reliability organizations: a systems approach to safety in complex systems. Organization Studies 2009;30:227–49. 10.1177/0170840608101478 - DOI
    1. Arnold RD, Wade JP. A definition of systems thinking: a systems approach. Procedia Comput Sci 2015;44:669–78. 10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050 - DOI
    1. Francis R. Report of the mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation trust public inquiry. London: Stationery Office, 2013. http://cdn.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/sites/default/files/report/Executi...
    1. Peters DH. The application of systems thinking in health: why use systems thinking? Health Res Policy Syst 2014;12:51 10.1186/1478-4505-12-51 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Savigny Dde, Adam T. Systems thinking for health systems strengthening. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, 2009.

LinkOut - more resources