Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Mar 24;10(3):e026345.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026345.

Negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard moist wound care on diabetic foot ulcers in real-life clinical practice: results of the German DiaFu-RCT

Dörthe Seidel  1 , Martin Storck  2 , Holger Lawall  3   4 , Gernold Wozniak  5 , Peter Mauckner  6 , Dirk Hochlenert  7 , Walter Wetzel-Roth  8 , Klemens Sondern  9 , Matthias Hahn  10 , Gerhard Rothenaicher  11 , Thomas Krönert  12 , Karl Zink  13 , Edmund Neugebauer  14   15
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard moist wound care on diabetic foot ulcers in real-life clinical practice: results of the German DiaFu-RCT

Dörthe Seidel et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the DiaFu study was to evaluate effectiveness and safety of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients with diabetic foot wounds in clinical practice.

Design: In this controlled clinical superiority trial with blinded outcome assessment patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio stratified by study site and ulcer severity grade using a web-based-tool.

Setting: This German national study was conducted in 40 surgical and internal medicine inpatient and outpatient facilities specialised in diabetes foot care.

Participants: 368 patients were randomised and 345 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Adult patients suffering from a diabetic foot ulcer at least for 4 weeks and without contraindication for NPWT were allowed to be included.

Interventions: NPWT was compared with standard moist wound care (SMWC) according to local standards and guidelines.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Primary outcome was wound closure within 16 weeks. Secondary outcomes were wound-related and treatment-related adverse events (AEs), amputations, time until optimal wound bed preparation, wound size and wound tissue composition, pain and quality of life (QoL) within 16 weeks, and recurrences and wound closure within 6 months.

Results: In the ITT population, neither the wound closure rate (difference: n=4 (2.5% (95% CI-4.7% - 9.7%); p=0.53)) nor the time to wound closure (p=0.244) was significantly different between the treatment arms. 191 participants (NPWT 127; SMWC 64) had missing endpoint documentations, premature therapy ends or unauthorised treatment changes. 96 participants in the NPWT arm and 72 participants in the SMWC arm had at least one AE (p=0.007), but only 16 AEs were related to NPWT.

Conclusions: NPWT was not superior to SMWC in diabetic foot wounds in German clinical practice. Overall, wound closure rate was low. Documentation deficits and deviations from treatment guidelines negatively impacted the outcome wound closure.

Trial registration numbers: NCT01480362 and DRKS00003347.

Keywords: benefit assessment; diabetic foot; negative pressure wound therapy; wound care; wound healing; wound treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The German statutory health insurance companies commissioned the Witten/Herdecke University (UW/H) to plan, conduct, analyse and publish the study. DS is an employee of the UW/H. The study has been financed by the manufacturers KCI (Acelity) and S&N. DS received a consulting fee for the presentation of the study during an event organised by the manufacturer Hartmann. During study planning and conduct, EN was an employee of the UW/H. He was the director of the Institut für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin. The clinical investigators MS, HL, GW, PM, DH, WW-R, KS, MH, GR, TK and KZ received a case fee of 1000€ for each patient included in the DiaFu study in order to compensate for the additional organisational and especially the documentation effort during trial conduct. Furthermore, all investigators received compensation for travelling to the investigator meetings. The institutions of the investigators used integrated care contracts for NPWT during study conduct in order to provide best practice for the study participants during outpatient care. GW and WW-R are members of the scientific advisory board of the manufacturer KCI (now Acelity).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile (CONSORT); CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; NPWT, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy; SMWC, Standard Moist Wound Care.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time until complete, sustained and verified wound closure in the ITT population. NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy; SMWC, standard moist wound care.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time until complete, sustained and verified wound closure for the subgroup of large wounds. NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy; SMWC, standard moist wound care.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time until complete, sustained and verified wound closure for the subgroup of small wounds. NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy; SMWC, standard moist wound care.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Time until complete, sustained and verified wound closure in the PP population; NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy; SMWC, standard moist wound care.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization Global report on diabetes, 2016. Available: http://www.who.int/diabetes/global-report/en/
    1. International Diabetes Federation IDF diabetes atlas, 2015. Available: www.diabetesatlas.org
    1. Yazdanpanah L, Nasiri M, Adarvishi S. Literature review on the management of diabetic foot ulcer. World J Diabetes 2015;6:37–53. 10.4239/wjd.v6.i1.37 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leone S, Pascale R, Vitale M, et al. . [Epidemiology of diabetic foot]. Infez Med 2012;20 Suppl 1:8–13. - PubMed
    1. Wu L, Norman G, Dumville JC, et al. . Dressings for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;55. 10.1002/14651858.CD010471.pub2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data