Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e1115-e1118.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003766.

Standardized Surgical Primary Repair for Burst Abdomen Reduces the Risk of Fascial Redehiscence

Thomas K Jensen  1 , Ismail Gögenur  2 , Mai-Britt Tolstrup  1
Affiliations

Standardized Surgical Primary Repair for Burst Abdomen Reduces the Risk of Fascial Redehiscence

Thomas K Jensen et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether a standardized surgical primary repair for burst abdomen could lower the rate of fascial redehiscence.

Summary background data: Burst abdomen after midline laparotomy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The surgical treatment is poorly investigated but known for a poor outcome with high rates of re-evisceration (redehiscence).

Methods: This study was a single-center, interventional study comparing rates of fascial redehiscence after surgery for burst abdomen in a study cohort (July 2014-April 2019) to a historical cohort (January 2009-December 2013). A standardized surgical strategy was introduced for burst abdomen: The abdominal wall was closed using a slowly absorbable running suture in a mass closure technique with "large bites" of 3 cm in "small steps" of 5 mm, in an approximate wound-suture ratio of 1:10. Demographics, comorbidities, preceding type of surgery, and surgical technique were registered. The primary outcome was fascial redehiscence. The secondary outcome was 30- and 90-day mortality.

Results: The study included 186 patients with burst abdomen (92 patients in the historical cohort vs 94 patients in the study cohort). No difference in sex, performance status, comorbidity, or body mass index was found. In 77% of the historical cohort and 80% of the study cohort, burst abdomen occurred after emergency laparotomy (P = 0.664). The rate of redehiscence was reduced from 13% (12/92 patients) in the historical cohort to 4% (4/94 patients) in the study cohort (P = 0.033). There was no difference in 30- or 90-day mortality.

Conclusion: Standardized surgical primary repair for burst abdomen reduced the rate of fascial redehiscence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Webster C, Neumayer L, Smout R, et al. Prognostic models of abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy. J Surg Res 2003; 109:130–137.
    1. Bloemen A, Van Dooren P, Huizinga BF, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure. Br J Surg 2011; 98:633–639.
    1. Kenig J, Richter P, Lasek A, et al. The efficacy of risk scores for predicting abdominal wound dehiscence: a case-controlled validation study. BMC Surg 2014; 14:65.
    1. Meena K, Ali S, Chawla AS, et al. A prospective study of factors influencing wound dehiscence after midline laparotomy. Surg Sci 2013; 4:357–358.
    1. Kim JJ, Liang MK, Subramanian A, et al. Predictors of relaparotomy after nontrauma emergency general surgery with initial fascial closure. Am J Surg 2011; 202:549–552.

LinkOut - more resources